Literature DB >> 10650839

Paleo-demography of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup: application of the maximum likelihood method.

Y J Li1, Y Satta, N Takahata.   

Abstract

The species divergence times and demographic histories of Drosophila melanogaster and its three sibling species, D. mauritiana, D. simulans, and D. yakuba, were investigated using a maximum likelihood (ML) method. Thirty-nine orthologous loci for these four species were retrieved from DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database. Both autosomal and X-linked loci were used in this study. A significant degree of rate heterogeneity across loci was observed for each pair of species. Most loci have the GC content greater than 50% at the third codon position. The codon usage bias in Drosophila loci is considered to result in the high GC content and the heterogenous rates across loci. The chi-square, G, and Fisher's exact tests indicated that data sets with 11, 23, and 9 pairs of DNA sequences for the comparison of D. melanogaster with D. mauritiana, D. simulans, and D. yakuba, respectively, retain homogeneous rates across loci. We applied the ML method to these data sets to estimate the DNA sequence divergences before and after speciation of each species pair along with their standard deviations. Using 1.6 x 10(-8) as the rate of nucleotide substitutions per silent site per year, our results indicate that the D. melanogaster lineage split from D. yakuba approximately 5.1 +/- 0.8 million years ago (mya), D. mauritiana 2.7 +/- 0.4 mya, and D. simulans 2.3 +/- 0.3 mya. It implies that D. melanogaster became distinct from D. mauritiana and D. simulans at approximately the same time and from D. yakuba no earlier than 10 mya. The effective ancestral population size of D. melanogaster appears to be stable over evolutionary time. Assuming 10 generations per year for Drosophila, the effective population size in the ancestral lineage immediately prior to the time of species divergence is approximately 3 x 10(6), which is close to that estimated for the extant D. melanogaster population. The D. melanogaster did not encounter any obvious bottleneck during the past 10 million years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10650839     DOI: 10.1266/ggs.74.117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Genet Syst        ISSN: 1341-7568            Impact factor:   1.517


  35 in total

1.  Demography and natural selection have shaped genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a multi-locus approach.

Authors:  Sascha Glinka; Lino Ometto; Sylvain Mousset; Wolfgang Stephan; David De Lorenzo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  On the dependence of speciation rates on species abundance and characteristic population size.

Authors:  Anastassia M Makarieva; Victor G Gorshkov
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  A genome-wide scan for genes under balancing selection in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Myriam Croze; Andreas Wollstein; Vedran Božičević; Daniel Živković; Wolfgang Stephan; Stephan Hutter
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  The first steps of transposable elements invasion: parasitic strategy vs. genetic drift.

Authors:  Arnaud Le Rouzic; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The relationship of nucleotide polymorphism, recombination rate and selection in wild tomato species.

Authors:  Kerstin Roselius; Wolfgang Stephan; Thomas Städler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Distinctly different sex ratios in African and European populations of Drosophila melanogaster inferred from chromosomewide single nucleotide polymorphism data.

Authors:  Stephan Hutter; Haipeng Li; Steffen Beisswanger; David De Lorenzo; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Conserved motifs and dynamic aspects of the terminal inverted repeat organization within Bari-like transposons.

Authors:  Roberta Moschetti; Sarantis Chlamydas; Renè Massimiliano Marsano; Ruggiero Caizzi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.291

8.  Estimating the genomewide rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  John J Welch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Alternative splicing of the Drosophila Dscam pre-mRNA is both temporally and spatially regulated.

Authors:  A M Celotto; B R Graveley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Evidence that strong positive selection drives neofunctionalization in the tandemly duplicated polyhomeotic genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Steffen Beisswanger; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.