Literature DB >> 10649924

Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel.

A T Hara1, C M Amaral, L A Pimenta, M A Sinhoreti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the enamel shear bond strength of four hydrophilic adhesive systems: one multiple-bottle (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus), two one-bottle (Stae, Single Bond) and one self-etching (Etch & Prime).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 120 bovine incisor teeth were obtained, embedded in polyester resin, polished to 600 grit to form standardized enamel surfaces, and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 30). Each adhesive system was used on enamel according to the manufacturer's instructions, and resin-based composite (Z100) cylinders with 3 mm diameter and 5 mm height were bonded. Specimens were stored in humid environment for 1 week, and bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine, at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute.
RESULTS: The mean shear bond strength values (MPa +/- SD) were: Single Bond: 24.28 +/- 5.27 (a); Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus: 21.18 +/- 4.35 (ab); Stae: 19.56 +/- 4.71 (b); Etch &amp; Prime 3.0: 15.13 +/- 4.92 (c). ANOVA revealed significant difference in means (P < 0.01) and Tukey's test showed the statistical differences that are expressed by different letters for each group. It could be concluded that the self-etching adhesive system did not provide as good a bond to enamel surface, as did the one- and multiple-bottle systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10649924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  7 in total

1.  Two-year evaluation of a new nano-ceramic restorative material.

Authors:  J F Schirrmeister; K Huber; E Hellwig; P Hahn
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations.

Authors:  Alessandro Vichi; Mariam Margvelashvili; Cecilia Goracci; Federica Papacchini; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis of self-etching adhesive systems to ground and unground enamel.

Authors:  Dinesh D S Weerasinghe; Toru Nikaido; Shizuko Ichinose; Kanchana G P Waidyasekara; Junji Tagami
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 4.727

4.  Three-year randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations.

Authors:  Senthamaraiselvi Palaniappan; Liesbeth Elsen; Inge Lijnen; Marleen Peumans; Bart Van Meerbeek; Paul Lambrechts
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Relationship between Operator Skill and In Vitro Microleakage of Different Adhesive Systems in Class V Restorations.

Authors:  Audrey Guéders; Sabine Geerts
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2010-11-29

6.  An in vitro evaluation of leakage of two etch and rinse and two self-etch adhesives after thermocycling.

Authors:  Sabine Geerts; Amandine Bolette; Laurence Seidel; Audrey Guéders
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-05-22

7.  Bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors to ground versus unground enamel.

Authors:  A Ruya Yazici; Zeren Yildirim; Atila Ertan; Gül Ozgunaltay; Berrin Dayangac; Sibel A Antonson; Donald E Antonson
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2012-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.