Literature DB >> 10649172

Monitoring pregnancy outcomes after prenatal drug exposure through prospective pregnancy registries: a pharmaceutical company commitment.

R Reiff-Eldridge1, C R Heffner, S A Ephross, P S Tennis, A D White, E B Andrews.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Glaxo Wellcome becomes aware of prenatal exposures to its medications as early as the clinical trial phase of development. An international process for monitoring prenatal exposure to all Glaxo Wellcome medicines has been developed. For specific products there are prospective pregnancy registries. STUDY
DESIGN: The registries are observational, case-registration, and follow-up studies designed to detect evidence of teratogenicity associated with specific medications. After prenatal exposure to the registry medication, pregnancies are registered prospectively, through voluntary reports by health care providers. An advisory committee of independent scientists for each registry reviews data and advises in dissemination of information. Risk of birth defects, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is compared with published risks both in women in the general population and in women with the underlying condition being treated, if available.
RESULTS: The following data show results from the prospective first-trimester exposures registered since establishment of each registry. The published risk of birth defects in the general population range is 3% to 5%, and the risk in women with epilepsy is 6% to 9%. The proportions of outcomes with birth defects are as follows: in the Acyclovir (antiviral medication) Pregnancy Registry (1984-1998) (19/581), 3.3% (95% confidence interval, 2.0%-5.2%); in the Lamotrigine (monotherapy and polytherapy antiepileptic medication) Pregnancy Registry (1992-September 1998) (8/123), 6.5% (95% confidence interval, 3.1%-12.8%); in the Sumatriptan (migraine medication) Pregnancy Registry (1996-October 1998) (7/183), 3.8% (95% confidence interval, 1.7%-8.0%). The Valacyclovir, Bupropion, and Naratriptan registries have insufficient data for analysis.
CONCLUSION: None of the registries has provided a risk estimate exceeding that expected in the disorder treated, and no pattern of defects has been observed. Whereas information from the larger registries is reassuring regarding risk, these studies cannot rule out possible small excess risks from use of these drugs in pregnancy. Data obtained through these registries are shared with the medical community as a supplement to animal toxicology studies to assist in weighing potential risks and benefits of treatment for individual patients. The success of the registries depends on the continued willingness of the obstetrics and gynecology community to notify the registries of prenatal exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10649172     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70506-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  25 in total

1.  Complete the Following Statement: Industry-Sponsored Antiepileptic Drug Pregnancy Registries Provide Information that is Beneficial to:: PatientsDoctorsThe SponsorAll of the AboveNone of the AboveCannot Respond Due to Risk of COI.

Authors:  Cynthia L Harden
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.500

Review 2.  Migraine during pregnancy: options for therapy.

Authors:  Anthony W Fox; Merle L Diamond; Egilius L H Spierings
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Tolerability of the triptans: clinical implications.

Authors:  Giuseppe Nappi; Giorgio Sandrini; Grazia Sances
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Pregnancy outcomes in women with epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published pregnancy registries and cohorts.

Authors:  Kimford Meador; Matthew W Reynolds; Sheila Crean; Kyle Fahrbach; Corey Probst
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 5.  Treatment of epilepsy in women of reproductive age: pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  James W McAuley; Gail D Anderson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Clinical and therapeutic issues for herpes simplex virus-2 and HIV co-infection.

Authors:  Jairam R Lingappa; Connie Celum
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Pregnancy exposure registries.

Authors:  Dianne L Kennedy; Kathleen Uhl; Sandra L Kweder
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Neonatal herpes simplex infection.

Authors:  David W Kimberlin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Antiherpetic medication use and the risk of gastroschisis: findings from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2007.

Authors:  Katherine A Ahrens; Marlene T Anderka; Marcia L Feldkamp; Mark A Canfield; Allen A Mitchell; Martha M Werler
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 10.  Herpes simplex virus infection in pregnancy and in neonate: status of art of epidemiology, diagnosis, therapy and prevention.

Authors:  Elena Anzivino; Daniela Fioriti; Monica Mischitelli; Anna Bellizzi; Valentina Barucca; Fernanda Chiarini; Valeria Pietropaolo
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 4.099

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.