Literature DB >> 10648387

Rapid molecular response during early induction chemotherapy predicts a good outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

E R Panzer-Grümayer1, M Schneider, S Panzer, K Fasching, H Gadner.   

Abstract

Early response to therapy is an independent prognostic factor in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Although most patients have rapid early responses, as detected by morphology, 15% to 20% of patients have relapses. The authors evaluated residual disease by molecular methods on day 15 of minimal residual disease (MRD) therapy and compared these data with their recently established MRD-based risk stratification, defined by MRD levels 5 weeks after induction treatment and before consolidation. All 68 children treated according to current Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) protocols went into morphologically complete remission after induction. There was a significant difference in outcome between children with rapid disease clearance and those with high levels of day-15 MRD (P =.035). Among patients with high levels of day-15 MRD, only the MRD-based risk stratification was predictive of the outcome. All patients with negative or low day-15 MRD had excellent prognoses and were in the MRD-based low-risk group. Thus, after only 2 weeks of treatment, the authors were able to identify a patient population of 20% who may benefit from the least intensive treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10648387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  41 in total

Review 1.  The clinical relevance of detection of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  J Moppett; G A A Burke; C G Steward; A Oakhill; N J Goulden
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Genes contributing to minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: prognostic significance of CASP8AP2.

Authors:  Christian Flotho; Elaine Coustan-Smith; Deqing Pei; Shotaro Iwamoto; Guangchun Song; Cheng Cheng; Ching-Hon Pui; James R Downing; Dario Campana
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Quantitative analysis of minimal residual disease predicts relapse in children with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia in DFCI ALL Consortium Protocol 95-01.

Authors:  Jianbiao Zhou; Meredith A Goldwasser; Aihong Li; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Donna Neuberg; Hongjun Wang; Virginia Dalton; Kathryn D McBride; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman; John G Gribben
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Time point-dependent concordance of flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gaipa; Giovanni Cazzaniga; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Renate Panzer-Grümayer; Barbara Buldini; Daniela Silvestri; Leonid Karawajew; Oscar Maglia; Richard Ratei; Alessandra Benetello; Simona Sala; Angela Schumich; Andre Schrauder; Tiziana Villa; Marinella Veltroni; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Valentino Conter; Martin Schrappe; Andrea Biondi; Michael N Dworzak; Giuseppe Basso
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Minimal residual disease in peripheral blood at day 15 identifies a subgroup of childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia with superior prognosis.

Authors:  Jana Volejnikova; Ester Mejstrikova; Tatana Valova; Leona Reznickova; Ladislava Hodonska; Vladimir Mihal; Jaroslav Sterba; Yahia Jabali; Daniela Prochazkova; Bohumir Blazek; Jiri Hak; Zdenka Cerna; Ondrej Hrusak; Jan Stary; Jan Trka; Eva Fronkova
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies.

Authors:  Jacques J M van Dongen; Vincent H J van der Velden; Monika Brüggemann; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its relationship to other prognostic factors: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Michael J Borowitz; Meenakshi Devidas; Stephen P Hunger; W Paul Bowman; Andrew J Carroll; William L Carroll; Stephen Linda; Paul L Martin; D Jeanette Pullen; David Viswanatha; Cheryl L Willman; Naomi Winick; Bruce M Camitta
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  A simplified flow cytometric assay identifies children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who have a superior clinical outcome.

Authors:  Elaine Coustan-Smith; Raul C Ribeiro; Patricia Stow; Yinmei Zhou; Ching-Hon Pui; Gaston K Rivera; Francisco Pedrosa; Dario Campana
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  The effect of peritransplant minimal residual disease in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Rebecca Slack; Jeffrey L Jorgensen; Sa A Wang; Gabriela Rondon; Marcos de Lima; Elizabeth Shpall; Uday Popat; Stefan Ciurea; Amin Alousi; Muzaffar Qazilbash; Chitra Hosing; Susan O'Brien; Deborah Thomas; Hagop Kantarjian; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Richard E Champlin; Partow Kebriaei
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2014-01-15

10.  Flow cytometric chemosensitivity assay as a predictive tool of early clinical response in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Faith Galderisi; Linda Stork; Ju Li; Motomi Mori; Solange Mongoue-Tchokote; James Huang
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.