Literature DB >> 19499583

Flow cytometric chemosensitivity assay as a predictive tool of early clinical response in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Faith Galderisi1, Linda Stork, Ju Li, Motomi Mori, Solange Mongoue-Tchokote, James Huang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Residual disease or rapidity of response to induction therapy is among the most powerful predictors of outcome in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
METHOD: Utilizing a multiparameter flow cytometric chemosensitivity assay (FCCA), we studied the relationship between in vitro drug sensitivity of diagnostic leukemic blasts from 30 children with ALL and rapidity of response to induction therapy. We also analyzed the in vitro drug sensitivity of de novo leukemic blasts among various clinical subsets.
RESULTS: Compared to rapid early responders (RERs), slow early responders (SERs) had a significantly greater in vitro drug resistance to dexamethasone (DEX; P = 0.04) and prednisone (P = 0.05). The studies with all other drugs showed a non-significant trend with the SER having a higher in vitro drug resistance compared to the RER. Risk group stratified analyses indicated that in vitro resistance to asparaginase (ASP), DEX, and vincristine (VCR) were each significantly related to having very high risk ALL. Additionally, a significantly higher in vitro drug resistance to ASP and VCR was associated with unfavorable lymphoblast genetics and ultimate relapse.
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that this FCCA is a potentially simple and rapid method to detect inherent resistance to initial ALL therapy very early in induction, thus allowing for treatment modification shortly thereafter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19499583      PMCID: PMC2775428          DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer        ISSN: 1545-5009            Impact factor:   3.167


  46 in total

1.  Accurate quantification of minimal residual disease at day 15, by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reavtion identifies also patients with B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia at high risk for relapse.

Authors:  V de Haas; W B Breunis; O J Verhagen; H van der Berg; C E van der Schoot
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Is there a relationship between in vitro drug resistance and level of minimal residual disease as detected by polymerase chain reaction at the end of induction therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia?

Authors:  V De Haas; G J L Kaspers; L Oosten; D Bresters; R Pieters; V H J Van Der Velden; E R Van Wering; H Van Den Berg; C E Van Der Schoot
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Drug resistance in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: predictable by in vitro evaluation with a multiparameter flow cytometric cytotoxicity assay.

Authors:  Yanping Zhong; Antony C Bakke; Guang Fan; Rita M Braziel; Ken M Gatter; Jose F Leis; Richard T Maziarz; James Z Huang
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.058

4.  Post-induction residual leukemia in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia quantified by PCR correlates with in vitro prednisolone resistance.

Authors:  K Schmiegelow; C Nyvold; J Seyfarth; R Pieters; M M Rottier; N Knabe; L P Ryder; H O Madsen; A Svejgaard; G J Kaspers
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Children's Cancer Group trials in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: 1983-1995.

Authors:  P S Gaynon; M E Trigg; N A Heerema; M G Sensel; H N Sather; G D Hammond; W A Bleyer
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Early response to therapy and outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a review.

Authors:  P S Gaynon; A A Desai; B C Bostrom; R J Hutchinson; B J Lange; J B Nachman; G H Reaman; H N Sather; P G Steinherz; M E Trigg; D G Tubergen; F M Uckun
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Risk- and response-based classification of childhood B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a combined analysis of prognostic markers from the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Children's Cancer Group (CCG).

Authors:  Kirk R Schultz; D Jeanette Pullen; Harland N Sather; Jonathan J Shuster; Meenakshi Devidas; Michael J Borowitz; Andrew J Carroll; Nyla A Heerema; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Mignon L Loh; Elizabeth A Raetz; Naomi J Winick; Stephen P Hunger; William L Carroll; Paul S Gaynon; Bruce M Camitta
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Prediction of response to drug therapy of cancer. A review of in vitro assays.

Authors:  W T Bellamy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Early response to induction therapy as a predictor of disease-free survival and late recurrence of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Childrens Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  D R Miller; P F Coccia; W A Bleyer; J N Lukens; S E Siegel; H N Sather; G D Hammond
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES UPON LYMPHOCYTES : I. THE REACTIONS OF LYMPHOCYTES UNDER VARIOUS EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS.

Authors:  A M Pappenheimer
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1917-05-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cytotoxicity of the anti-CD22 immunotoxin HA22 (CAT-8015) against paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  Francis Mussai; Dario Campana; Deepa Bhojwani; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Seth M Steinberg; Alan S Wayne; Ira Pastan
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 2.  Current status of methods to assess cancer drug resistance.

Authors:  Theodor H Lippert; Hans-Jörg Ruoff; Manfred Volm
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.