Literature DB >> 10647986

Electron absorbed fractions and dose conversion factors for marrow and bone by skeletal regions.

K F Eckerman1, M G Stabin.   

Abstract

The possible inductions of bone cancer and leukemia are the two health effects of primary concern in the irradiation of the skeleton. The relevant target tissues to consider in the dosimetric evaluation have been the cells on or near endosteal surfaces of bone, from which osteosarcomas are thought to arise, and hematopoietic bone marrow, which is associated with leukemia. The complex geometry of the soft tissue-bone intermixture makes calculations of absorbed doses to these target regions a difficult problem. In the case of photon or neutron radiations, charged particle equilibrium may not exist in the vicinity of a soft tissue-bone mineral interface. In this paper, absorbed fraction data are developed for calculations of the dose in the target tissues from electron emitters deposited within the volume or on the surfaces of trabecular bone. The skeletal average absorbed fractions presented are consistent with usage of this quantity in the contemporary dosimetric formulations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Implementation of the new bone and marrow model is then developed within the context of the calculational schema of the Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) Committee. Model parameters relevant to the calculation of dose conversion factors (S values) for different regions of the skeleton of individuals of various age are described, and an example calculation is performed for a monoclonal antibody which localizes in the marrow. The utility of these calculations for radiation dose calculations in nuclear medicine is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10647986     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200002000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  9 in total

1.  EANM Dosimetry Committee guidelines for bone marrow and whole-body dosimetry.

Authors:  Cecilia Hindorf; Gerhard Glatting; Carlo Chiesa; Ola Lindén; Glenn Flux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  An image-based skeletal dosimetry model for the ICRP reference adult male--internal electron sources.

Authors:  Matthew Hough; Perry Johnson; Didier Rajon; Derek Jokisch; Choonsik Lee; Wesley Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Software package for integrated data processing for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine (SPRIND).

Authors:  Eric Visser; Ernst Postema; Otto Boerman; Jeroen Visschers; Wim Oyen; Frans Corstens
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  An exponential growth of computational phantom research in radiation protection, imaging, and radiotherapy: a review of the fifty-year history.

Authors:  X George Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  An update on computational anthropomorphic anatomical models.

Authors:  Azadeh Akhavanallaf; Hadi Fayad; Yazdan Salimi; Antar Aly; Hassan Kharita; Huda Al Naemi; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-07-11

6.  Monte Carlo simulations of absorbed dose in a mouse phantom from 18-fluorine compounds.

Authors:  Richard Taschereau; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Stem cell niches and other factors that influence the sensitivity of bone marrow to radiation-induced bone cancer and leukaemia in children and adults.

Authors:  Richard B Richardson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Comparison of trace element concentration in bone and intervertebral disc tissue by atomic absorption spectrometry techniques.

Authors:  Łukasz Kubaszewski; Anetta Zioła-Frankowska; Marcin Frankowski; Piotr Rogala; Zuzanna Gasik; Jacek Kaczmarczyk; Andrzej Nowakowski; Mikolaj Dabrowski; Wojciech Labedz; Grzegorz Miękisiak; Robert Gasik
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Bone lesion absorbed dose profiles in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with molecular radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ana M Denis-Bacelar; Sarah J Chittenden; V Ralph McCready; Antigoni Divoli; David P Dearnaley; Joe M O'Sullivan; Bernadette Johnson; Glenn D Flux
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.039

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.