Literature DB >> 10647659

10 years of experience with penile prosthesis implantation in Taiwanese patients.

H S Chiang1, C C Wu, T C Wen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the long-term results of penile prosthesis implantation during the last 10 years. Special considerations were examined concerning Asian corporeal diameter, device survival and sociocultural factors influencing patient-partner satisfaction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We followed 331 patients who underwent penile prosthesis implantation from December 1985 to May 1996. Surgical data, postoperative complications and information from a survey on satisfaction are reported.
RESULTS: The most prevalent corporeal diameter in our patients was 11.0 to 11.5 cm. Postoperatively wound infection was the most serious surgical complication. The 5-year device survival was similar in the malleable and inflatable types except for a poorer outcome with the self-contained inflatable Hydroflex penile prosthesis. Overall patient satisfaction with surgery was 86.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: Penile prosthesis implantation still has its place as definitive therapy in some patients with uncorrectable erectile dysfunction. In Taiwanese society more consideration of prosthesis selection, surgical preparation and patient-partner counseling is the basis for further success in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10647659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  Male sexual dysfunction in Asia.

Authors:  Christopher Ck Ho; Praveen Singam; Goh Eng Hong; Zulkifli Md Zainuddin
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Penoscrotal versus minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a single-center matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Pietro Grande; Gabriele Antonini; Cristiano Cristini; Ettore De Berardinis; Antonio Gatto; Giovanni Di Lascio; Andrea Lemma; Giuseppe Gentile; Giovanni Battista Di Pierro
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Mohit Khera; Irwin Goldstein
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-06-29

4.  Comparison of patient satisfaction rates for the malleable and two piece-inflatable penile prostheses.

Authors:  Hakan Kılıçarslan; Yurdaer Kaynak; Kaan Gökcen; Burhan Coşkun; Onur Kaygısız
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-12

5.  Penile prosthesis implantation in Chinese patients with severe erectile dysfunction: 10-year experience.

Authors:  Wei-Dong Song; Yi-Ming Yuan; Wan-Shou Cui; Alex K Wu; Yi-Chen Zhu; Jing Liu; Lin Wang; Guang-Yi Bai; Jing Peng; Zhi-Chao Zhang; Bing Gao; Ying-Lu Guo; Tom F Lue; Zhong-Cheng Xin
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 6.  Current use of penile implants in erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy; Steven K Wilson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 7.  Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.

Authors:  Michael Polchert; Brian Dick; Omer Raheem
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

8.  Preservation of cavernosal erectile function after soft penile prosthesis implant in Peyronie's disease: long-term followup.

Authors:  Marco Grasso; Caterina Lania; Flavio Fortuna; Salvatore Blanco; Igor Piacentini
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008-12-02

9.  The Decline of Inpatient Penile Prosthesis over the 10-Year Period, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Amjad Alwaal; Catherine R Harris; Ahmed A Hussein; Thomas H Sanford; Charles E McCulloch; Alan W Shindel; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.491

Review 10.  Epidemiology regarding penile prosthetic surgery.

Authors:  Jose A Saavedra-Belaunde; Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.