Literature DB >> 10647159

Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

J C Wang1, P W McDonough, K K Endow, R B Delamarter.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review of all patients surgically treated with a two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without anterior plate fixation by a single surgeon.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and radiographic success of two-level discectomy and the effect of anterior cervical plate fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prior studies of multisegment fusions have shown decreased fusion rates correlating with the number of increased levels. The use of anterior plates for single-level cervical fusions is controversial. However, their use in multilevel fusions may be warranted because of the increased pseudarthrosis rates.
METHODS: Over a 6-year period, 60 patients were treated surgically with a two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion by the senior author. Thirty-two patients had cervical plates, and 28 underwent fusions without plates. These patients were followed for an average of 2.7 years. Clinical and radiographic follow-up evaluations were performed.
RESULTS: Of the 60 patients, 7 had a pseudarthrosis. The pseudarthrosis rates were 0% for patients with plating and 25% for those with no plating. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003). No correlation of pseudarthrosis with gender, age, level of surgery, history of tobacco use, or the presence of prior anterior surgery was found. There was significantly less graft collapse (P = 0.0001) in the patients without plates in whom pseudarthrosis developed (1.4 mm) than in those who had fusions with plates (0.3 mm). The amount of kyphotic deformity of the fused segment was 0.4 degree in patients with plating compared with 4.9 degrees in those without plating who developed a pseudarthrosis (P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of plate fixation for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is a safe procedure with no significant increase in complication rates. The pseudarthrosis rates are significantly higher in patients treated without plate fixation. No nonunions occurred in the patients treated with plate fixation. There was significantly less disc space collapse and kyphotic deformity with the plated fusions than with the nonplated fusions, in which a pseudarthrosis developed. The complication rates for plated fusions are extremely low and do not differ from those for nonplated fusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10647159     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200001010-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  56 in total

Review 1.  Anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  P W Pavlov
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The cervical spine and its relation to anterior plate-screw fixation: a quantitative study.

Authors:  Sven R Kantelhardt; Joachim Oberle; Sharam Derakhshani; Erich Kast
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Marc Anthony Limson; Soo-Bum Kim; Jose Joefrey F Arbatin; Kee-Young Chang; Moon-Soo Park; Jae-hyuk Shin; Yeong-Su Ju
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ahmad Faizan; Vivek Palepu; Sanghita Bhattacharya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Successful treatment of cervical myelopathy with minimal morbidity by circumferential decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Henry E Aryan; Rene O Sanchez-Mejia; Sharona Ben-Haim; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Jaypal Reddy Sangala; Edward A M Duckworth; Fernando L Vale
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in patients with cervical disc degeneration: a prospective outcome study of 258 patients (181 fused with autologous bone graft and 77 fused with a PEEK cage).

Authors:  Bjarne Lied; Paal Andre Roenning; Jarle Sundseth; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Diagnosing cervical fusion: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Nanin Sethi; James Devney; Holly L Steiner; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31

9.  Impact of a Bundled Payment System on Resource Utilization During Spine Surgery.

Authors:  James M Mok; Maximilian Martinez; Harvey E Smith; Daniel M Sciubba; Peter G Passias; Andrew Schoenfeld; Robert E Isaacs; Alexander R Vaccaro; Kris E Radcliff
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-05-16

10.  Fibular allograft and anterior plating for dislocations/fractures of the cervical spine.

Authors:  A Ramnarain; S Govender
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.