Literature DB >> 10644946

The distribution of structures in evolving protein populations.

D M Taverna1, R A Goldstein.   

Abstract

Proteins exhibit a nonuniform distribution of structures. A number of models have been advanced to explain this observation by considering the distribution of designabilities, that is, the fraction of all sequences that could successfully fold into any particular structure. It has been postulated that more designable structures should be more common, although the exact nature of this relationship has not been addressed. We find that the nonuniform distribution of protein structures found in nature can be explained by the interplay of evolution and population dynamics with the designability distribution. The relative frequency of different structures has a greater-than-linear dependence on designability, making the distribution of observed protein structures more uneven than the distribution of designabilities. The distribution of structures is also affected by additional factors such as the topology of the sequence space and the similarity of other structures.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10644946     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(200001)53:1<1::AID-BIP1>3.0.CO;2-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopolymers        ISSN: 0006-3525            Impact factor:   2.505


  30 in total

1.  Evolution of functionality in lattice proteins.

Authors:  P D Williams; D D Pollock; R A Goldstein
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.518

2.  Expanding protein universe and its origin from the biological Big Bang.

Authors:  Nikolay V Dokholyan; Boris Shakhnovich; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Natural selection of more designable folds: a mechanism for thermophilic adaptation.

Authors:  Jeremy L England; Boris E Shakhnovich; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Roles of mutation and recombination in the evolution of protein thermodynamics.

Authors:  Yu Xia; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Stability and the evolvability of function in a model protein.

Authors:  Jesse D Bloom; Claus O Wilke; Frances H Arnold; Christoph Adami
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Funnel-like organization in sequence space determines the distributions of protein stability and folding rate preferred by evolution.

Authors:  Yu Xia; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-04-01

7.  Imprint of evolution on protein structures.

Authors:  Guido Tiana; Boris E Shakhnovich; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Protein structure and evolutionary history determine sequence space topology.

Authors:  Boris E Shakhnovich; Eric Deeds; Charles Delisi; Eugene Shakhnovich
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Comparing folding codes in simple heteropolymer models of protein evolutionary landscape: robustness of the superfunnel paradigm.

Authors:  Richard Wroe; Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Sequence optimization and designability of enzyme active sites.

Authors:  Raj Chakrabarti; Alexander M Klibanov; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.