Literature DB >> 10643405

A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic responses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm grasp.

R Berguer1, S Gerber, G Kilpatrick, M Remler, D Beckley.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic techniques allow for less-invasive treatment of common surgical problems. Laparoscopic instruments are different from standard surgical instruments and generally incorporate a pistol-grip handle configuration with rings for the fingers. This handle configuration has been reported as being uncomfortable, leading to finger compression neuropathies in some cases. As an alternative, the surgeon can choose to grasp laparoscopic instruments using a more powerful palm grip during grasping motions. This study evaluates the hypothesis that the use of the palm grip requires less muscle tension than the finger-grip when grasping with laparoscopic instruments. Nine general surgeons used an Autosuture laparoscopic grasper with a ringed pistol-grip handle held in both a finger-in-ring (F) or palm (P) hand grip position to grasp and close two spring-loaded metal plates. The same task was performed with a surgical haemostat clamp (H) for comparison. Each subject performed the grasping task in a random sequence for the three instrument configurations at two grasping forces levels (0.7 and 4.2 N), and with the instrument at three angles to the subjects' sagittal plane (0 degree, 45 degrees and 90 degrees). Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals were acquired from the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), extensor digitorum comunis (EDC) and the thenar compartment (TH). The peak root mean squared (RMS) EMG voltage was averaged for five repetitions at each instrument, force and angle condition. Statistical analysis was carried out by repeated measures ANOVA. The muscle EMG RMS amplitude while using the palm grip was decreased in the FDS, TH and EDC, was unchanged in the ECU and FCU, and was slightly higher in the FDP when compared with the finger grip. These differences were most prominent at 90 degrees to the sagittal plane where the subjects' wrists neared maximal flexion. It is concluded that the palm grip is more powerful than the finger grip when grasping with laparoscopic instruments, particularly at angles perpendicular to the surgeon's sagittal plane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10643405     DOI: 10.1080/001401399184721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  11 in total

1.  Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  M A van Veelen; E A L Nederlof; R H M Goossens; C J Schot; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: an electromyographic-based study.

Authors:  U Matern; G Kuttler; C Giebmeyer; P Waller; M Faist
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Measuring mental workload during the performance of advanced laparoscopic tasks.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Maria A Cassera; Danny V Martinec; Georg O Spaun; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera.

Authors:  Seong-Ho Kong; Byung-Mo Oh; Hongman Yoon; Hye Seong Ahn; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Sun Geun Chung; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Ergonomics of disposable handles for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  D Büchel; R Mårvik; B Hallabrin; U Matern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A query on da Vinci robot console preferences: insights for the novice surgeon.

Authors:  Igor Sorokin; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-11-15

Review 7.  Minimal access surgery (MAS)-related surgeon morbidity syndromes.

Authors:  D A G Reyes; B Tang; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 3.453

8.  Screen height as an ergonomic factor in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J Zehetner; A Kaltenbacher; W Wayand; A Shamiyeh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Objective ergonomic risk assessment of wrist and spine with motion analysis technique during simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy in experienced and novice surgeons.

Authors:  Twinkle Yogesh Dabholkar; Sujata Sudhir Yardi; Sanjay Narahari Oak; Sneha Ramchandani
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Quality and safety of minimally invasive surgery: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Bernadette McCrory; Chad A LaGrange; Ms Hallbeck
Journal:  Biomed Eng Comput Biol       Date:  2014-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.