Literature DB >> 10641886

The influence of dietary selenium as selenium yeast or sodium selenite on the concentration of selenium in the milk of Suckler cows and on the selenium status of their calves.

B Pehrson1, K Ortman, N Madjid, U Trafikowska.   

Abstract

The aim of this trial was to determine whether the selenium status of suckling calves could be improved by supplementing their dams' diet with organic Se instead of sodium selenite. A herd of 103 Hereford cows, which were on grass paddocks all year round, was divided into two groups. Both groups had free access to a mineral supplement that contained 30 mg of Se/kg; for one group the source of the Se was a Se yeast product, and for the other group the source was sodium selenite. The basal feed contained .02 mg of Se/kg DM. During the trial, the mean daily consumption of the mineral supplement was approximately 110 g/cow. The calving season started in the middle of March and ended in the middle of May. Blood samples were taken from 11 cows and their calves in the yeast group and from nine in the selenite group at the end of April and again at the beginning of June, and milk samples were taken at the same times. At both samplings, the concentration of Se in whole blood and the activity of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) in the erythrocytes of the cows and calves in the yeast group were higher than in the samples from the animals in the selenite group. The same pattern was seen for plasma, except for the cows at the first sampling. The mean concentrations of Se in whole blood from calves in the yeast and selenite groups were 130 and 84 microg/L, respectively, and plasma concentrations were 48 and 34 microg/ L, respectively. Mean Se concentration in the milk from the yeast group (17.3 microg/L) was higher than that in milk from the selenite group (12.7 microg/L). There were significant correlations (r = .59 to .68) between the concentrations of Se in the cow's milk or cow's whole blood compared with Se concentrations in the calves whole blood and plasma or with the erythrocyte GSH-Px activity of the calves. The Se status of the calves in the selenite group was considered to be marginal, but the status of the calves in the yeast group was considered to be adequate. Supplementation of the suckler cows' diet with organic Se in the form of Se yeast rather than sodium selenite improved the Se status of their calves when the Se was mixed into a mineral supplement containing 30 mg of Se/kg. In practice, such supplementation would probably eliminate the risk of nutritional muscular degeneration in suckling calves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10641886     DOI: 10.2527/1999.77123371x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Computational characterization of sodium selenite using density functional theory.

Authors:  Diana Barraza-Jiménez; Manuel Alberto Flores-Hidalgo; Donald H Galvan; Esteban Sánchez; Daniel Glossman-Mitnik
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 2.  Revisiting the Effects of Different Dietary Sources of Selenium on the Health and Performance of Dairy Animals: a Review.

Authors:  Muhammad Adeel Arshad; Hossam Mahrous Ebeid; Faiz-Ul Hassan
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Forms of selenium in vitamin-mineral mixes differentially affect serum prolactin concentration and hepatic glutamine synthetase activity of steers grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue.

Authors:  Yang Jia; Qing Li; W R Burris; Glenn E Aiken; Phillip J Bridges; James C Matthews
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Preliminary study on Se-enriched Lentinula edodes mycelium as a proposal of new feed additive in selenium deficiency.

Authors:  Bożena Muszyńska; Ewelina Szacawa; Dorota Bederska-Łojewska; Katarzyna Dudek; Bartosz Pomierny; Anna Włodarczyk; Katarzyna Kała; Jan Lazur; Piotr Suchocki; Bogusława Budziszewska; Dariusz Bednarek; Marek Pieszka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Efficacy of a Long-Acting Injectable Selenium Preparation Administered to Pregnant Ewes and Lambs.

Authors:  Stanisław Milewski; Przemysław Sobiech; Justyna Błażejak-Grabowska; Roman Wójcik; Katarzyna Żarczyńska; Jan Miciński; Katarzyna Ząbek
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Form of Supplemental Selenium Affects the Expression of mRNA Transcripts Encoding Selenoproteins, and Proteins Regulating Cholesterol Uptake, in the Corpus Luteum of Grazing Beef Cows.

Authors:  Sarah N Carr; Benjamin R Crites; Joy L Pate; Camilla H K Hughes; James C Matthews; Phillip J Bridges
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  The health benefits of selenium in food animals: a review.

Authors:  Brittany M Pecoraro; Diego F Leal; Alba Frias-De-Diego; Matthew Browning; Jack Odle; Elisa Crisci
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-13

8.  Effect of Supplementation with the Combination of Se-Enriched Lentinula edodes Mycelium, Exogenous Enzymes, Acidifiers, Sodium Butyrate and Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticle Feed Additives on Selected Parameters in Calves.

Authors:  Ewelina Szacawa; Katarzyna Dudek; Magdalena Wasiak; Dariusz Bednarek; Dorota Bederska-Łojewska; Bożena Muszyńska; Marek Pieszka
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 4.927

9.  Influence of organic versus inorganic dietary selenium supplementation on the concentration of selenium in colostrum, milk and blood of beef cows.

Authors:  Petr Slavik; Josef Illek; Michal Brix; Jaroslava Hlavicova; Radko Rajmon; Frantisek Jilek
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 1.695

10.  Organic selenium supplementation increased selenium concentrations in ewe and newborn lamb blood and in slaughter lamb meat compared to inorganic selenium supplementation.

Authors:  Arvid Steen; Turid Strøm; Aksel Bernhoft
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 1.695

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.