Literature DB >> 10641016

Pulmonary and intraperitoneal inflammation induced by cellulose fibres.

R T Cullen1, A Searl, B G Miller, J M Davis, A D Jones.   

Abstract

The inflammatory effects of respirable cellulose fibres were studied in two short-term animal models: intraperitoneal injection in mice, and inhalation in rats. The mouse peritoneal cavity is particularly sensitive to fibrous compared to non-fibrous particles. Both cellulose fibres and the positive control fibre, crocidolite asbestos, were administered in doses ranging from 10(4) to 10(8) fibres and caused marked, dose-dependent recruitment of inflammatory cells to the mouse peritoneal cavity, which was highest 1 day following injection. Crocidolite was much more active than cellulose, despite the mass dose of cellulose being 66 times greater for an equivalent number of fibres. Crocidolite at the higher doses caused inflammation to persist through 7 days. For the inhalation study, rats were exposed daily, 5 days per week, to aerosols of cellulose dust for ca. 3 weeks at a concentration of 1000 fibres ml(-1). Inhalation exposure induced an early inflammatory response in rat lungs, as determined by bronchoalveolar lavage, which peaked at 1 day following the start of inhalation and thereafter declined, despite a further 13 days of exposure over a period of 18 calendar days. In vitro production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) by lavaged alveolar macrophages was markedly depressed by the end of the exposure period in cellulose-exposed animals, compared to sham-exposed controls, and this effect was still present in rats that had been allowed to recover for 28 days beyond the end of exposure. We conclude that the cellulose material studied is less inflammogenic than crocidolite and that the extent of the inflammatory response within the lung appears to reduce with continued exposure over a 14-day period. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10641016     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1263(200001/02)20:1<49::aid-jat627>3.0.co;2-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  9 in total

1.  Lung biodurability and free radical production of cellulose nanomaterials.

Authors:  Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Mohindar S Seehra; Natalie R Fix; Stephen S Leonard
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  The Crystallinity and Aspect Ratio of Cellulose Nanomaterials Determine Their Pro-Inflammatory and Immune Adjuvant Effects In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Xiang Wang; Chong Hyun Chang; Jinhong Jiang; Qi Liu; Yu-Pei Liao; Jianqin Lu; Linjiang Li; Xiangsheng Liu; Joshua Kim; Ayman Ahmed; André E Nel; Tian Xia
Journal:  Small       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 13.281

3.  Fibrillar vs crystalline nanocellulose pulmonary epithelial cell responses: Cytotoxicity or inflammation?

Authors:  Autumn L Menas; Naveena Yanamala; Mariana T Farcas; Maria Russo; Sherri Friend; Philip M Fournier; Alexander Star; Ivo Iavicoli; Galina V Shurin; Ulla B Vogel; Bengt Fadeel; Donald Beezhold; Elena R Kisin; Anna A Shvedova
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Effect of Surface Modification on the Pulmonary and Systemic Toxicity of Cellulose Nanofibrils.

Authors:  Kukka Aimonen; Mira Hartikainen; Monireh Imani; Satu Suhonen; Gerard Vales; Carlos Moreno; Hanna Saarelainen; Kirsi Siivola; Esa Vanhala; Henrik Wolff; Orlando J Rojas; Hannu Norppa; Julia Catalán
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.978

5.  Enhanced morphological transformation of human lung epithelial cells by continuous exposure to cellulose nanocrystals.

Authors:  E R Kisin; N Yanamala; D Rodin; A Menas; M Farcas; M Russo; S Guppi; T O Khaliullin; I Iavicoli; M Harper; A Star; V E Kagan; A A Shvedova
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 6.  Nonpulmonary outcomes of asbestos exposure.

Authors:  Melisa Bunderson-Schelvan; Jean C Pfau; Robert Crouch; Andrij Holian
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 7.  A Review on the toxicology and dietetic role of bacterial cellulose.

Authors:  Fernando Dourado; Miguel Gama; Ana Cristina Rodrigues
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2017-09-25

8.  Screening and prioritization of nano- and microplastic particle toxicity studies for evaluating human health risks - development and application of a toxicity study assessment tool.

Authors:  Todd Gouin; Robert Ellis-Hutchings; Leah M Thornton Hampton; Christine L Lemieux; Stephanie L Wright
Journal:  Microplast nanoplast       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 9.  Nanomaterials: A Review about Halloysite Nanotubes, Properties, and Application in the Biological Field.

Authors:  Giuseppa Biddeci; Gaetano Spinelli; Paolo Colomba; Francesco Di Blasi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.208

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.