Literature DB >> 25265049

Lung biodurability and free radical production of cellulose nanomaterials.

Aleksandr B Stefaniak1, Mohindar S Seehra, Natalie R Fix, Stephen S Leonard.   

Abstract

Abstract The potential applications of cellulose nanomaterials in advanced composites and biomedicine makes it imperative to understand their pulmonary exposure to human health. Here, we report the results on the biodurability of three cellulose nanocrystal (CNC), two cellulose nanofibril (CNF) and a benchmark cellulose microcrystal (CMC) when exposed to artificial lung airway lining fluid (SUF, pH 7.3) for up to 7 days and alveolar macrophage phagolysosomal fluid (PSF, pH 4.5) for up to 9 months. X-ray diffraction analysis was used to monitor biodurability and thermogravimetry, surface area, hydrodynamic diameter, zeta potential and free radical generation capacity of the samples were determined (in vitro cell-free and RAW 264.7 cell line models). The CMC showed no measurable changes in crystallinity (x(CR)) or crystallite size D in either SUF or PSF. For one CNC, a slight decrease in x(CR) and D in SUF was observed. In acidic PSF, a slight increase in x(CR) with exposure time was observed, possibly due to dissolution of the amorphous component. In a cell-free reaction with H₂O₂, radicals were observed; the CNCs and a CNF generated significantly more ·OH radicals than the CMC (p < 0.05). The ·OH radical production correlates with particle decomposition temperature and is explained by the higher surface area to volume ratio of the CNCs. Based on their biodurability, mechanical clearance would be the primary mechanism for lung clearance of cellulose materials. The production of ·OH radicals indicates the need for additional studies to characterize the potential inhalation hazards of cellulose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodurability; X-ray diffraction; cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils; free radicals; microcrystalline cellulose; pulmonary inflammation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25265049      PMCID: PMC4522936          DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2014.948650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inhal Toxicol        ISSN: 0895-8378            Impact factor:   2.724


  29 in total

1.  Ultrasonic dispersion of nanoparticles for environmental, health and safety assessment--issues and recommendations.

Authors:  Julian S Taurozzi; Vincent A Hackley; Mark R Wiesner
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 5.913

Review 2.  Spin trapping: ESR parameters of spin adducts.

Authors:  G R Buettner
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 7.376

3.  Individualization of nano-sized plant cellulose fibrils by direct surface carboxylation using TEMPO catalyst under neutral conditions.

Authors:  Tsuguyuki Saito; Masayuki Hirota; Naoyuki Tamura; Satoshi Kimura; Hayaka Fukuzumi; Laurent Heux; Akira Isogai
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 6.988

4.  Surface-modified biodegradable albumin nano- and microspheres. II: effect of surface charges on in vitro phagocytosis and biodistribution in rats.

Authors:  M Roser; D Fischer; T Kissel
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.571

5.  Strong and tough cellulose nanopaper with high specific surface area and porosity.

Authors:  Houssine Sehaqui; Qi Zhou; Olli Ikkala; Lars A Berglund
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 6.988

6.  Measurement of respiratory burst products generated by professional phagocytes.

Authors:  Claes Dahlgren; Anna Karlsson; Johan Bylund
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2007

7.  Association of 59iron oxide with alveolar macrophages during alveolar clearance.

Authors:  B E Lehnert; P E Morrow
Journal:  Exp Lung Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.459

8.  Comparison of stainless and mild steel welding fumes in generation of reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Stephen S Leonard; Bean T Chen; Samuel G Stone; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Allison J Kenyon; David Frazer; James M Antonini
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 9.400

9.  Thermal and mechanical properties of bio-nanocomposites reinforced by Luffa cylindrica cellulose nanocrystals.

Authors:  Gilberto Siqueira; Julien Bras; Nadège Follain; Sabrina Belbekhouche; Stéphane Marais; Alain Dufresne
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 9.381

10.  In search of the most relevant parameter for quantifying lung inflammatory response to nanoparticle exposure: particle number, surface area, or what?

Authors:  Klaus Wittmaack
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  14 in total

1.  Pulmonary exposure to cellulose nanocrystals caused deleterious effects to reproductive system in male mice.

Authors:  Mariana T Farcas; Elena R Kisin; Autumn L Menas; Dmitriy W Gutkin; Alexander Star; Richard S Reiner; Naveena Yanamala; Kai Savolainen; Anna A Shvedova
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2016-08-24

Review 2.  Nanocelluloses - Nanotoxicology, Safety Aspects and 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Gary Chinga-Carrasco; Jennifer Rosendahl; Julia Catalán
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Nanocelluloses: Production, Characterization and Market.

Authors:  Paulo J T Ferreira; Ana F Lourenço
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Effect of Surface Modification on the Pulmonary and Systemic Toxicity of Cellulose Nanofibrils.

Authors:  Kukka Aimonen; Mira Hartikainen; Monireh Imani; Satu Suhonen; Gerard Vales; Carlos Moreno; Hanna Saarelainen; Kirsi Siivola; Esa Vanhala; Henrik Wolff; Orlando J Rojas; Hannu Norppa; Julia Catalán
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.978

5.  Enhanced morphological transformation of human lung epithelial cells by continuous exposure to cellulose nanocrystals.

Authors:  E R Kisin; N Yanamala; D Rodin; A Menas; M Farcas; M Russo; S Guppi; T O Khaliullin; I Iavicoli; M Harper; A Star; V E Kagan; A A Shvedova
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Gender differences in murine pulmonary responses elicited by cellulose nanocrystals.

Authors:  Anna A Shvedova; Elena R Kisin; Naveena Yanamala; Mariana T Farcas; Autumn L Menas; Andrew Williams; Philip M Fournier; Jeffrey S Reynolds; Dmitriy W Gutkin; Alexander Star; Richard S Reiner; Sabina Halappanavar; Valerian E Kagan
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 7.  A critical review of the current knowledge regarding the biological impact of nanocellulose.

Authors:  C Endes; S Camarero-Espinosa; S Mueller; E J Foster; A Petri-Fink; B Rothen-Rutishauser; C Weder; M J D Clift
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 10.435

8.  Role of Surface Chemistry in the In Vitro Lung Response to Nanofibrillated Cellulose.

Authors:  Kukka Aimonen; Satu Suhonen; Mira Hartikainen; Viviana R Lopes; Hannu Norppa; Natalia Ferraz; Julia Catalán
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.076

9.  Surface functionalization and size modulate the formation of reactive oxygen species and genotoxic effects of cellulose nanofibrils.

Authors:  Kukka Aimonen; Monireh Imani; Mira Hartikainen; Satu Suhonen; Esa Vanhala; Carlos Moreno; Orlando J Rojas; Hannu Norppa; Julia Catalán
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 9.400

10.  Safety Aspects of Bio-Based Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Julia Catalán; Hannu Norppa
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.