OBJECTIVE: To study the tissue reaction in and around the implant, the changes in implant volume and the DNA profile of the invading cells when a new substance, dextranomers in sodium hyaluronan solution (DiHA), was injected into experimental animals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine pigs were followed up from 2 weeks to 3.5 months and 34 rats were followed up from 3 weeks to 16 months after injection of DiHA into the bladder in pigs and into the subcutaneous tissue in rats. Histopathological analysis was performed in 16 pig and 63 rat implants. In 31 of the rat implants the DNA profile was analysed. Changes in implant volume over time were estimated in 51 rat implants during the period up to 12 months after implantation. RESULTS: Histologically, in the early phases the area within and around the implant was fairly rich in cells, predominantly fibroblasts, inflammatory cells and giant cells of the foreign body type. Later in the process an increase in extracellular matrix around the microspheres and ingrowth of blood vessels was seen. No tissue necrosis or significant eosinophilia was observed around the implants. DNA measurements by flow cytometry revealed no aneuploid cells. There was a decrease in implant volume by 23% over a period of 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: DiHA does not induce any major tissue changes in and around the implants. No DNA changes were observed during the study period of 16 months. DiHA seem to be a safe and suitable injectable substance with good tissue-augmenting properties.
OBJECTIVE: To study the tissue reaction in and around the implant, the changes in implant volume and the DNA profile of the invading cells when a new substance, dextranomers in sodium hyaluronan solution (DiHA), was injected into experimental animals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine pigs were followed up from 2 weeks to 3.5 months and 34 rats were followed up from 3 weeks to 16 months after injection of DiHA into the bladder in pigs and into the subcutaneous tissue in rats. Histopathological analysis was performed in 16 pig and 63 rat implants. In 31 of the rat implants the DNA profile was analysed. Changes in implant volume over time were estimated in 51 rat implants during the period up to 12 months after implantation. RESULTS: Histologically, in the early phases the area within and around the implant was fairly rich in cells, predominantly fibroblasts, inflammatory cells and giant cells of the foreign body type. Later in the process an increase in extracellular matrix around the microspheres and ingrowth of blood vessels was seen. No tissue necrosis or significant eosinophilia was observed around the implants. DNA measurements by flow cytometry revealed no aneuploid cells. There was a decrease in implant volume by 23% over a period of 12 months. CONCLUSIONS:DiHA does not induce any major tissue changes in and around the implants. No DNA changes were observed during the study period of 16 months. DiHA seem to be a safe and suitable injectable substance with good tissue-augmenting properties.
Authors: Murat Alkan; Arbay O Ciftci; Beril Talim; Mehmet E Senocak; Melda Caglar; Nebil Buyukpamukcu Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2006-10-17 Impact factor: 1.827