Literature DB >> 10635191

Assessing the quality of clinical procedures and technical standards of dental laboratories in fixed partial denture therapy.

Z S Albashaireh1, A S Alnegrish.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to assess the quality of impressions and tooth preparations sent to dental laboratories in Jordan and to determine the technical capabilities of these laboratories to construct fixed partial dentures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 136 impressions and stone casts were examined for clinical errors in 35 laboratories that construct fixed partial dentures. They were sorted into unusable, unsatisfactory, acceptable, or satisfactory categories. The type of impression material and tray, opposing arch impressions, and occlusal records were noted. Instructions to technicians were assessed for completeness and clarity. Information regarding laboratory staff and equipment were collected.
RESULTS: Half of the specimens inspected were categorized as unusable or unsatisfactory; these were found in commercial laboratories. They showed at least one clinical error such as drags or indefinite finishing lines in impressions and inadequate reduction, undercuts, or obvious taper on stone casts. Alginate impression material was used for 65% of the cases. Only 27% of specimens were accompanied with instructions; of these 22% were graded poor. No occlusal records were available with 54% of the specimens and no articulators were used except in dental school laboratories. The dental schools and some commercial laboratories had the best staff and equipment and were more capable of fabricating fixed partial dentures than those of the Ministry of Health and the Royal Med cal Services.
CONCLUSION: The quality of abutment preparation and impressions were unsatisfactory or unusable in 50% of cases. Of the 37 available instructions 8 were not clear. The dental schools and some commercial laboratories were technically capable of producing good quality fixed partial dentures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10635191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of crown and bridge work quality among Sudanese dental practitioners.

Authors:  A B Mohamed; Neamat Hassan Abu-Bakr
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2010-08-05

2.  Laboratory Technician Assessment of the Quality of Single-Unit Crown Preparations and Impressions as Predictors of the Clinical Acceptability of Crowns as Determined by the Treating Dentist: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; Mark S Litaker; Alexandra E S Thomson; Alan Slootsky; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Communication methods and production techniques in fixed prosthesis fabrication: a UK based survey. Part 2: production techniques.

Authors:  J Berry; M Nesbit; S Saberi; H Petridis
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen.

Authors:  Nusaiba M Al-Odinee; Mohsen Al-Hamzi; Ibrahim Z Al-Shami; Ahmed Madfa; Abdulwahab I Al-Kholani; Yazeed M Al-Olofi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.