Literature DB >> 10632001

The interview with the donor's family before postmortem cornea procurement.

M Muraine1, E Menguy, J Martin, P Sabatier, L Watt, G Brasseur.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Asking the family of a deceased patient to consider eye donation is one of the most difficult aspects of the donation process. The aim of this prospective study was to describe the content of interviews with the families of potential donors and to analyze their reactions to improve the process of eye donation.
METHODS: We consecutively met with 151 families of suitable corneal donors at the Rouen University Hospital. All interviews with donor families were analyzed using a preestablished questionnaire.
RESULTS: In only 17.9% of cases was the family aware of the potential donor's last will. In 77.7% of these cases, the patient wished to donate. Procurement rate was 71.5%. This acceptance was mostly facilitated by the awareness and motivation of the hospital staff, the experience of the physician, and the 13.3-h period of time allowed after the donor's death. The commitment on the part of the ophthalmologist to carry out optimal anatomical restoration was a very important point for 32% of families who accepted donation. Twenty-one percent of families asked for a delay for reflection. This delay helped to obtain a positive response in 72.7% of cases and even sometimes helped families to reconsider a previously negative position (14% of initial refusals).
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that a high positive response (71.5%) can be obtained from the donor's family when a trained and motivated group manages the post-mortem cornea donation request.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10632001     DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200001000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  9 in total

1.  [Evaluation of the need for communication training of ophthalmologists for gaining telephone consent for cornea donation].

Authors:  S Stiel; S Salla; A Steinfeld; L Radbruch; P Walter; M Hermel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Impact of telephone consent and potential for eye donation in the UK: the Newcastle Eye Centre study.

Authors:  D S J Ting; J Potts; M Jones; T Lawther; W J Armitage; F C Figueiredo
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Consent for corneal donation: the effect of age of the deceased, registered intent and which family member is asked about donation.

Authors:  M Lawlor; T Dobbins; K-A Thomas; F Billson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Successful Implementation of a Program for Increasing Donor Eyes for Research: The Duke-Miracles In Sight Program.

Authors:  Andrew M Williams; Kristin M Perkumas; Isaac Perry; Joanne C Wen; Janet Keeling; Michael Tramber; Paloma B Liton; W Daniel Stamer
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  The Role of Specifically Tailored Communication Training Among Factors Influencing Consent for Cornea Donation Requested Via Telephone.

Authors:  Martin Hermel; Kathrin Monhof; Andre Steinfeld; Sabine Salla; Nicole Hamsley; Peter Walter; Stephanie Stiel
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Pro-donation behaviours of nursing students from the four countries of the UK.

Authors:  Donal McGlade; Carol McClenahan; Barbara Pierscionek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Corneal donation for research versus for transplantation: A-year prospective study of acceptance rates in a French University Hospital.

Authors:  Thibaud Garcin; Jean Loup Pugniet; Thierry Peyragrosse; Francoise Rogues; Sophie Acquart; Fabrice Cognasse; Gilles Thuret; Philippe Gain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Review of developments in corneal transplantation in the regions of Brazil - Evaluation of corneal transplants in Brazil.

Authors:  Hirlana Gomes Almeida; Richard Yudi Hida; Newton Kara
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Who's opting-in? A demographic analysis of the U.K. NHS Organ Donor Register.

Authors:  Catrin Pedder Jones; Chris Papadopoulos; Gurch Randhawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.