Literature DB >> 10631374

Effect of optical digitizer selection on the application accuracy of a surgical localization system-a quantitative comparison between the OPTOTRAK and flashpoint tracking systems.

Q Li1, L Zamorano, Z Jiang, J X Gong, A Pandya, R Perez, F Diaz.   

Abstract

Application accuracy is a crucial factor for stereotactic surgical localization systems, in which space digitization camera systems are one of the most critical components. In this study we compared the effect of the OPTOTRAK 3020 space digitization system and the FlashPoint Model 3000 and 5000 3D digitizer systems on the application accuracy for interactive localization of intracranial lesions. A phantom was mounted with several implantable frameless markers which were randomly distributed on its surface. The target point was digitized and the coordinates were recorded and compared with reference points. The differences from the reference points represented the deviation from the "true point." The root mean square (RMS) was calculated to show the differences, and a paired t-test was used to analyze the results. The results with the phantom showed that, for 1-mm sections of CT scans, the RMS was 0.76 +/- 0. 54 mm for the OPTOTRAK system, 1.23 +/- 0.53 mm for the FlashPoint Model 3000 3D digitizer system, and 1.00 +/- 0.42 mm for the FlashPoint Model 5000 system. These preliminary results showed that there is no significant difference between the three tracking systems, and, from the quality point of view, they can all be used for image-guided surgery procedures. Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Space Human Factors; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10631374     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0150(1999)4:6<314::AID-IGS3>3.0.CO;2-G

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Aided Surg        ISSN: 1092-9088


  5 in total

1.  Electromagnetic tracking for abdominal interventions in computer aided surgery.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Filip Banovac; Ralph Lin; Neil Glossop; Bradford J Wood; David Lindisch; Elliot Levy; Kevin Cleary
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2006-05

Review 2.  [Precision in orthopaedic computer navigation].

Authors:  T Hüfner; D Kendoff; M Citak; J Geerling; C Krettek
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Effect of improved navigation performance on the accuracy of implant placement in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system.

Authors:  Ichiro Nakahara; Takayuki Kyo; Yasuo Kuroda; Hidenobu Miki
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Influence of lower limb rotation in navigated alignment analysis: implications for high tibial osteotomies.

Authors:  D Kendoff; M Citak; A Pearle; M J Gardner; S Hankemeier; C Krettek; T Hüfner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Towards immersive virtual reality (iVR): a route to surgical expertise.

Authors:  Saurabh Dargar; Rebecca Kennedy; WeiXuan Lai; Venkata Arikatla; Suvranu De
Journal:  J Comput Surg       Date:  2015-05-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.