Literature DB >> 10631339

Radioresponsiveness at low doses: hyper-radiosensitivity and increased radioresistance in mammalian cells.

K A Skov1.   

Abstract

The rationale for and importance of research on effects after radiation at "low doses" are outlined. Such basic radiobiological studies on induction of repair enzymes, protective mechanisms, priming, and hypersensitivity are certainly all relevant to treatment of cancer (see Section 1, Studies at low doses - relevance to cancer treatment). Included are examples from many groups, using various endpoints to address the possibility of an induced resistance, which has been compared to the adaptive response [M.C. Joiner, P. Lambin, E.P. Malaise, T. Robson, J.E. Arrand, K.A. Skov, B. Marples, Hypersensitivity to very low single radiation doses: its relationship to the adaptive response and induced radioresistance, Mutat. Res. 358 (1996) 171-183.]. This is not intended to be an exhaustive review--rather a re-introduction of concepts such as priming and a short survey of molecular approaches to understanding induced resistance. New data on the response of HT29 cells after treatment (priming) with co-cultured activated neutrophils are included, with protection against X-rays (S1). Analysis of previously published results in various cells lines in terms of increased radioresistance (IRR)/intrinsic sensitivity are presented which complement a study on human tumour lines [P. Lambin, E.P. Malaise, M.C. Joiner, Might intrinsic radioresistance of human tumour cells be induced by radiation?, Int. Radiat. Biol. 69 (1996) 279-290].It is not feasible to extrapolate to low doses from studies at high doses. The biological responses probably vary with dose, LET, and have variable time frames. The above approaches may lead to new types of treatment, or additional means to assess radioresponsiveness of tumours. Studies in many areas of biology would benefit from considerations of different dose regions, as the biological responses vary with dose. There may also be some implications in the fields of radiation protection and carcinogenesis, and the extensions of concepts of hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS)/IRR extended to radiation exposure are considered in Section 2, Possible relevance of IRR concepts to radiation exposure (space). More knowledge on inducible responses could open new approaches for protection and means to assess genetic predisposition. Many endpoints are used currently--clonogenic survival, mutagenesis, chromosome aberrations and more direct--proteins/genes/functions/repair/signals, as well as different biological systems. Because of scant knowledge of the relevant aspects at low doses, such as inducible/protective mechanisms, threshold, priming, dose-rate effects, LET within one system, it is still too early to draw conclusions in the area of radiation exposure. Technological advances may permit much needed studies at low doses in the areas of both treatment and protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10631339     DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(99)00136-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  10 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Adaptive response and split-dose effect of radiation on the survival of mice.

Authors:  Ashu Bhan Tiku; R K Kale
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Modeling cell response to low doses of photon irradiation: Part 2--application to radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in human carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Micaela Cunha; Etienne Testa; Olga V Komova; Elena A Nasonova; Larisa A Mel'nikova; Nina L Shmakova; Michaël Beuve
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Exploiting sensitization windows of opportunity in hyper and hypo-fractionated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Anish Prasanna; Mansoor M Ahmed; Mohammed Mohiuddin; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  The role of DNA damage repair and Chk2 protein in hyper-radiosensitivity of lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells.

Authors:  Hongge Wu; Qitian Chen; Yong Zhang; Gang Wu; Rui Meng; Jing Cheng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-18

6.  Extracting the normal lung dose-response curve from clinical DVH data: a possible role for low dose hyper-radiosensitivity, increased radioresistance.

Authors:  J J Gordon; K Snyder; H Zhong; K Barton; Z Sun; I J Chetty; M Matuszak; R K Ten Haken
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The impact of the bystander effect on the low-dose hypersensitivity phenomenon.

Authors:  Otilia Nuta; Firouz Darroudi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  The Fukushima nuclear accident and the pale grass blue butterfly: evaluating biological effects of long-term low-dose exposures.

Authors:  Atsuki Hiyama; Chiyo Nohara; Wataru Taira; Seira Kinjo; Masaki Iwata; Joji M Otaki
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Dynamics of cellular responses to radiation.

Authors:  Dominik Wodarz; Ron Sorace; Natalia L Komarova
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Differential miRNA expression profiling reveals miR-205-3p to be a potential radiosensitizer for low- dose ionizing radiation in DLD-1 cells.

Authors:  Rodrigo Andaur; Julio C Tapia; José Moreno; Leopoldo Soto; Ricardo Armisen; Katherine Marcelain
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.