Literature DB >> 10629041

Dynamic analysis of proviral induction and De Novo methylation: implications for a histone deacetylase-independent, methylation density-dependent mechanism of transcriptional repression.

M C Lorincz1, D Schübeler, S C Goeke, M Walters, M Groudine, D I Martin.   

Abstract

Methylation of cytosines in the CpG dinucleotide is generally associated with transcriptional repression in mammalian cells, and recent findings implicate histone deacetylation in methylation-mediated repression. Analyses of histone acetylation in in vitro-methylated transfected plasmids support this model; however, little is known about the relationships among de novo DNA methylation, transcriptional repression, and histone acetylation state. To examine these relationships in vivo, we have developed a novel approach that permits the isolation and expansion of cells harboring expressing or silent retroviruses. MEL cells were infected with a Moloney murine leukemia virus encoding the green fluorescent protein (GFP), and single-copy, silent proviral clones were treated weekly with the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A or the DNA methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine. Expression was monitored concurrently by flow cytometry, allowing for repeated phenotypic analysis over time, and proviral methylation was determined by Southern blotting and bisulfite methylation mapping. Shortly after infection, proviral expression was inducible and the reporter gene and proviral enhancer showed a low density of methylation. Over time, the efficacy of drug induction diminished, coincident with the accumulation of methyl-CpGs across the provirus. Bisulfite analysis of cells in which 5-azacytidine treatment induced GFP expression revealed measurable but incomplete demethylation of the provirus. Repression could be overcome in late-passage clones only by pretreatment with 5-azacytidine followed by trichostatin A, suggesting that partial demethylation reestablishes the trichostatin-inducible state. These experiments reveal the presence of a silencing mechanism which acts on densely methylated DNA and appears to function independently of histone deacetylase activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10629041      PMCID: PMC85201          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.3.842-850.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  59 in total

1.  Methylation in the preinitiation domain suppresses gene transcription by an indirect mechanism.

Authors:  A Levine; G L Cantoni; A Razin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands.

Authors:  M Frommer; L E McDonald; D S Millar; C M Collis; F Watt; G W Grigg; P L Molloy; C L Paul
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  DNA methylation inhibits transcription indirectly via a methyl-CpG binding protein.

Authors:  J Boyes; A Bird
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-03-22       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Purification, sequence, and cellular localization of a novel chromosomal protein that binds to methylated DNA.

Authors:  J D Lewis; R R Meehan; W J Henzel; I Maurer-Fogy; P Jeppesen; F Klein; A Bird
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-06-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  DNA methylation and gene expression.

Authors:  A Razin; H Cedar
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-09

6.  Factors affecting long-term stability of Moloney murine leukemia virus-based vectors.

Authors:  L Xu; J K Yee; J A Wolff; T Friedmann
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.616

7.  Identification of a mammalian protein that binds specifically to DNA containing methylated CpGs.

Authors:  R R Meehan; J D Lewis; S McKay; E L Kleiner; A P Bird
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-08-11       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Inactivation of the Moloney murine leukemia virus long terminal repeat in murine fibroblast cell lines is associated with methylation and dependent on its chromosomal position.

Authors:  R C Hoeben; A A Migchielsen; R C van der Jagt; H van Ormondt; A J van der Eb
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Cloning of a negative transcription factor that binds to the upstream conserved region of Moloney murine leukemia virus.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; K G Becker; D L Ennist; S L Gleason; P H Driggers; B Z Levi; E Appella; K Ozato
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Repression of genes by DNA methylation depends on CpG density and promoter strength: evidence for involvement of a methyl-CpG binding protein.

Authors:  J Boyes; A Bird
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  38 in total

1.  Position effects are influenced by the orientation of a transgene with respect to flanking chromatin.

Authors:  Y Q Feng; M C Lorincz; S Fiering; J M Greally; E E Bouhassira
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Genomic targeting of methylated DNA: influence of methylation on transcription, replication, chromatin structure, and histone acetylation.

Authors:  D Schübeler; M C Lorincz; D M Cimbora; A Telling; Y Q Feng; E E Bouhassira; M Groudine
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Methylation-mediated proviral silencing is associated with MeCP2 recruitment and localized histone H3 deacetylation.

Authors:  M C Lorincz; D Schübeler; M Groudine
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  C(m)C(a/t)GG methylation: a new epigenetic mark in mammalian DNA?

Authors:  M C Lorincz; M Groudine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DNA methylation density influences the stability of an epigenetic imprint and Dnmt3a/b-independent de novo methylation.

Authors:  Matthew C Lorincz; Dirk Schübeler; Shauna R Hutchinson; David R Dickerson; Mark Groudine
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  The barrier function of an insulator couples high histone acetylation levels with specific protection of promoter DNA from methylation.

Authors:  Vesco J Mutskov; Catherine M Farrell; Paul A Wade; Alan P Wolffe; Gary Felsenfeld
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Erasure of CpG methylation in Arabidopsis alters patterns of histone H3 methylation in heterochromatin.

Authors:  Muhammad Tariq; Hidetoshi Saze; Aline V Probst; Jacek Lichota; Yoshiki Habu; Jerzy Paszkowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  High-frequency epigenetic repression and silencing of retroviruses can be antagonized by histone deacetylase inhibitors and transcriptional activators, but uniform reactivation in cell clones is restricted by additional mechanisms.

Authors:  Richard A Katz; Emily Jack-Scott; Anna Narezkina; Ivan Palagin; Pamela Boimel; Joseph Kulkosky; Emmanuelle Nicolas; James G Greger; Anna Marie Skalka
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Preferential epigenetic suppression of the autonomous MusD over the nonautonomous ETn mouse retrotransposons.

Authors:  Irina A Maksakova; Ying Zhang; Dixie L Mager
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Sleeping beauty transposase has an affinity for heterochromatin conformation.

Authors:  Ryuji Ikeda; Chikara Kokubu; Kosuke Yusa; Vincent W Keng; Kyoji Horie; Junji Takeda
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.