Literature DB >> 10628032

Minimum requirements for remote realtime fetal tele-ultrasound consultation.

F Y Chan1, J Whitehall, L Hayes, A Taylor, B Soong, K Lessing, R Cincotta, D Cooper, M Stone, A Lee-Tannock, S Baker, M Smith, E Green, R Whiting.   

Abstract

We studied the transmission bandwidth required for accurate diagnoses when performing realtime fetal tele-ultrasound consultations. The study was divided into three phases. In phase I, three experienced clinicians evaluated the quality of ultrasound images transmitted at various bandwidths (internally looped back within Brisbane) using eight commercially available codecs at random. The two codecs that performed best proceeded to phase 2, in which a realtime video-link of up to 2 Mbit/s was set up between Brisbane and Townsville (1,500 km apart). Testing with a standard video-tape was performed at seven different bandwidths selected at random, with four clinicians (who were blinded to the equipment and bandwidths used). The optimum line rates for transmission were determined, and testing was then performed using these line rates for fetuses with various anomalies (phase 3). The results showed significant differences in performance according to bandwidths used, but not according to observers. Bandwidths were grouped into three levels. At level I (256 kbit/s) the performance was significantly worse than at level II (384, 512 or 768 kbit/s), which was in turn worse than that at level III (1, 1.5 or 2 Mbit/s). However, within each level, performance at one bandwidth was not significantly different from that at the others. The most cost-effective transmission rates therefore appeared to be 384 kbit/s and 1 Mbit/s. Further testing with fetuses affected by various anomalies confirmed that the majority could be diagnosed using a 384 kbit/s link, with slight improvement in evaluation when the bandwidth was increased to 1 Mbit/s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10628032     DOI: 10.1258/1357633991933585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  5 in total

1.  Image quality in real-time teleultrasound of infant hip exam over low-bandwidth internet links: a transatlantic feasibility study.

Authors:  Dobrivoje Martinov; Veljko Popov; Zoran Ignjatov; Robert D Harris
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Tele-assessment of bandwidth limitation for remote robotics surgery.

Authors:  Yuma Ebihara; Eiji Oki; Satoshi Hirano; Hironobu Takano; Mitsuhiko Ota; Hajime Morohashi; Kenichi Hakamada; Shigeo Urushidani; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.540

3.  Potential Use of Remote Telesonography as a Transformational Technology in Underresourced and/or Remote Settings.

Authors:  Linping Pian; Lawrence M Gillman; Paul B McBeth; Zhengwen Xiao; Chad G Ball; Michael Blaivas; Douglas R Hamilton; Andrew W Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 1.112

Review 4.  Tele-ultrasound in the Era of COVID-19: A Practical Guide.

Authors:  Christopher Uschnig; Florian Recker; Michael Blaivas; Yi Dong; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Digital Otoscopy Videos Versus Composite Images: A Reader Study to Compare the Accuracy of ENT Physicians.

Authors:  Hamidullah Binol; Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi; Garth Essig; Jay Shah; Jameson K Mattingly; Michael S Harris; Charles Elmaraghy; Theodoros Teknos; Nazhat Taj-Schaal; Lianbo Yu; Metin N Gurcan; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.325

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.