Literature DB >> 10628031

An assessment framework for telemedicine applications.

D Hailey1, P Jacobs, J Simpson, S Doze.   

Abstract

Pressures for the adoption of telemedicine place increased demands on purchasers to assess applications of the technique. Assessment principles are helpful in defining an evaluation framework for use at the local level. We suggest an assessment approach that includes five specific elements: specification; performance measures; outcomes; summary measures; and operational and other considerations. The approach described here was developed to assist with the needs of individual health authorities and institutions within the health-care system of Alberta. Aspects of the approach are illustrated using a telepsychiatry example under the assumptions made. Conventional psychiatry (where the patient visited the psychiatrist) was most expensive for the patient. The alternatives, telepsychiatry and outreach psychiatry (where the psychiatrist travelled to the patient), cost about the same from the service provider's perspective (and from that of society as a whole); they were both much cheaper for the patient. At higher volumes, telepsychiatry would be cheaper than outreach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10628031     DOI: 10.1258/1357633991933576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  5 in total

Review 1.  Telepsychiatry and geriatric care.

Authors:  B N Jones
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Determining patient preferences for remote monitoring.

Authors:  Nuri Basoglu; Tugrul U Daim; Umit Topacan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  Telepsychiatry: an overview for psychiatrists.

Authors:  Donald M Hilty; John S Luo; Chris Morache; Divine A Marcelo; Thomas S Nesbitt
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Institutionalizing telemedicine applications: the challenge of legitimizing decision-making.

Authors:  Paolo Zanaboni; Emanuele Lettieri
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 5.  How to Value Digital Health Interventions? A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kolasa; Grzegorz Kozinski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.