Literature DB >> 10627844

Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers.

A J Simmers1, L S Gray, P V McGraw, B Winn.   

Abstract

We investigate the influence of stimulus contrast upon contour interaction in normal and amblyopic subjects. Using a computer generated acuity task, flanked and unflanked acuities were measured psychometrically at both high contrast (80%) and low contrast (6%), in a group of 19 normal and 11 amblyopic subjects. The crowding ratio for high contrast letters was found to be significantly higher than that for low contrast letters. The extent of the crowding zone was measured at high and low contrast by varying the separation of the optotype and flanking bars. The crowding zone measurement was repeated for the high contrast optotypes using dioptric blur. The position of the flanking contours was found to have a significant effect on letter resolution at high contrast but no significant effect was demonstrable at low contrast. With the addition of dioptric blur the effect of contour interaction became negligible at high contrast. These findings support the hypothesis that the crowding effect is: (1) similar in normal and amblyopic eyes when tested at threshold; (2) is contrast dependent appearing only for high contrast optotypes.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10627844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  16 in total

1.  Development of a clinically feasible logMAR alternative to the Snellen chart: performance of the "compact reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart in amblyopic children.

Authors:  D A H Laidlaw; A Abbott; D A Rosser
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Evaluating reading acuity and speed in children with microstrabismic amblyopia using a standardized reading chart system.

Authors:  E Stifter; G Burggasser; E Hirmann; A Thaler; W Radner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Shift in spatial scale in identifying crowded letters.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Adult discrimination performance for pediatric acuity test optotypes.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Sylvia R Mishoulam; Robert M Nosofsky; Velma Dobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  The Amblyopia Treatment Studies: Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Angela M Chen; Susan A Cotter
Journal:  Adv Ophthalmol Optom       Date:  2016-08

6.  A new visual acuity test on touchpad for vision screening in children.

Authors:  Elsa Di Foggia; Noémie Stoll; Hélène Meunier; Adam Rimelé; Pascal Ance; Pierre-Henri Moreau; Claude Speeg-Schatz; Arnaud Sauer
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Factors affecting crowded acuity: eccentricity and contrast.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Jeremy M Chin; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and the electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in amblyopic children aged 5 to 11 years.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Samara F Strauber; Roy W Beck; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 1.220

9.  Crowding between first- and second-order letters in amblyopia.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Roger W Li; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  High- and Low-contrast Letter Acuity during Image Motion in Normal Observers and Observers with Infantile Nystagmus Syndrome.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Sop Song
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.106

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.