Literature DB >> 10627726

A randomized trial of hydroxyapatite coated prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.

A J Yee1, H K Kreder, I Bookman, J R Davey.   

Abstract

In a prospective randomized trial, 62 consecutive primary cementless total hip arthroplasties in 55 patients were performed by one surgeon using either hydroxyapatite coated (35 hips) or nonhydroxyapatite coated femoral prostheses (27 hips). The dual tapered femoral stem had a Ti-6AI-4V plasma sprayed circumferential proximal porous coat applied to the proximal 1/3 of the stem. The middle 1/3 had a roughened blasted textured surface, and the distal 1/3 had a smooth surface. The hydroxyapatite coated femoral stems had an additional hydroxyapatite coating applied to the proximal porous coat with use of an air plasma process. The patients in the two groups were not significantly different regarding age (48.2 +/- 9.0 years hydroxyapatite group, 50.4 +/- 8.7 years control group), gender, Charnley class, or length of followup (4.4 +/- 0.7 years hydroxyapatite group, 4.9 +/- 1.0 years control group). Forty-nine patients (54 hips) were available for clinical followup, and 45 patients (50 hips) had radiographic followup. A minimum 3-year followup was recorded. To date, there have been no femoral prostheses failures. No femoral implant has migrated or subsided. Radiographically, the hydroxyapatite coated stems showed trends toward increased distal stem related cortical hypertrophy, increased cancellous condensation and less endosteal cavitation. Two nonhydroxyapatite coated stems had distal endosteal cavitation, whereas no hydroxyapatite coated stems did. There were two cases of acetabular osteolysis (revision in one) and two cases of acetabular cup migration (nonrevised), all occurring in the control group. The overall revision rate was 4%. There was no difference in Harris hip scores at 6 months (80.6 +/- 13.0 points hydroxyapatite group, 83.8 +/- 12.4 points control group) or at last followup (85.6 +/- 15.4 points hydroxyapatite group, 89.7 +/- 13.4 control group). The Harris hip pain scores also were not significantly different at 6 months or at last followup. Multiple linear regression analysis controlling for age, gender, and length of followup revealed no significant predictors of Harris hip or pain scores. The results of this study at an average of 4.6 years do not indicate a significant clinical advantage to the use of hydroxyapatite coated femoral prostheses in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty when judged by the criteria of Harris hip scores and femoral stem survivorship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10627726     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199909000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

1.  Clinical and radiological outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  T Gosens; E J van Langelaan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  What Is the Risk of Revision Surgery in Hydroxyapatite-coated Femoral Hip Stems? Findings From a Large National Registry.

Authors:  Maria C Inacio; Michelle Lorimer; David C Davidson; Richard N De Steiger; Peter L Lewis; Stephen E Graves
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A short-term follow-up study of a surgeon-customised fully-coated hydroxyapatite femoral stem using a nation-wide joint registry.

Authors:  Aneesh Dave; Bob Jang; Warwick Bruce
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-02-28

4.  High Subsidence Rate After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Zweymüller-type Noncemented Implant With a Matte Surface.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Kawai; Koji Goto; Yutaka Kuroda; Yaichiro Okuzu; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-06-07

5.  Bone-bonding properties of Ti metal subjected to acid and heat treatments.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Kawai; Mitsuru Takemoto; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Masashi Neo; Haruhiko Akiyama; Seiji Yamaguchi; Deepak K Pattanayak; Tomiharu Matsushita; Takashi Nakamura; Tadashi Kokubo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Seven-year results of a tapered, titanium, hydroxyapatite-coated cementless femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jin-Ho Cho; Jonathan P Garino; Suk-Kyu Choo; Kye-Young Han; Jung-Hoon Kim; Hyoung-Keun Oh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-11-05

7.  Does hydroxyapatite coating have no advantage over porous coating in primary total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun-Lin Chen; Tiao Lin; An Liu; Ming-Min Shi; Bin Hu; Zhong-Li Shi; Shi-Gui Yan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  The Effect of Hydroxyapatite Coating on Long-term Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Hydroxyapatite-coated Anatomic Femoral Stem.

Authors:  Young-Yool Chung; Chae-Hyun Im; Dae-Hee Kim; Ju-Yeong Heo; Young-Jae Jang
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2014-09-29

9.  Failure of dual radius hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cups.

Authors:  Fabio D'Angelo; Mauro Molina; Giacomo Riva; Giovanni Zatti; Paolo Cherubino
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.