Literature DB >> 10620522

Characterization of indoor particle sources: A study conducted in the metropolitan Boston area.

E Abt1, H H Suh, G Allen, P Koutrakis.   

Abstract

An intensive particle monitoring study was conducted in homes in the Boston, Massachusetts, area during the winter and summer of 1996 in an effort to characterize sources of indoor particles. As part of this study, continuous particle size and mass concentration data were collected in four single-family homes, with each home monitored for one or two 6-day periods. Additionally, housing activity and air exchange rate data were collected. Cooking, cleaning, and the movement of people were identified as the most important indoor particle sources in these homes. These sources contributed significantly both to indoor concentrations (indoor-outdoor ratios varied between 2 and 33) and to altered indoor particle size distributions. Cooking, including broiling/baking, toasting, and barbecuing contributed primarily to particulate matter with physical diameters between 0.02 and 0.5 microm [PM((0.02-0.5))], with volume median diameters of between 0.13 and 0.25 microm. Sources of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters between 0.7 and 10 microm [PM((0.7-10))] included sautéing, cleaning (vacuuming, dusting, and sweeping), and movement of people, with volume median diameters of between 3 and 4.3 microm. Frying was associated with particles from both PM((0.02-0.5)) and PM((0.7-10)). Air exchange rates ranged between 0.12 and 24.3 exchanges/hr and had significant impact on indoor particle levels and size distributions. Low air exchange rates (< 1 exchange/hr) resulted in longer air residence times and more time for particle concentrations from indoor sources to increase. When air exchange rates were higher (> 1 exchange/hr), the impact of indoor sources was less pronounced, as indoor particle concentrations tracked outdoor levels more closely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10620522      PMCID: PMC1637850          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0010835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  14 in total

1.  An approach to evaluating and correcting aerodynamic particle sizer measurements for phantom particle count creation.

Authors:  W A Heitbrink; P A Baron
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1992-07

2.  Daily mortality and PM10 pollution in Utah Valley.

Authors:  C A Pope; J Schwartz; M R Ransom
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1992 May-Jun

3.  Particle Total Exposure Assessment Methodology (PTEAM) study: distributions of aerosol and elemental concentrations in personal, indoor, and outdoor air samples in a southern California community.

Authors:  C A Clayton; R L Perritt; E D Pellizzari; K W Thomas; R W Whitmore; L A Wallace; H Ozkaynak; J D Spengler
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1993 Apr-Jun

4.  Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles?

Authors:  J Schwartz; D W Dockery; L M Neas
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Personal exposure to airborne particles and metals: results from the Particle TEAM study in Riverside, California.

Authors:  H Ozkaynak; J Xue; J Spengler; L Wallace; E Pellizzari; P Jenkins
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar

6.  Low flow rate sharp cut impactors for indoor air sampling: design and calibration.

Authors:  V A Marple; K L Rubow; W Turner; J D Spengler
Journal:  JAPCA       Date:  1987-11

Review 7.  The sizes of particulate sulfate and nitrate in the atmosphere--a review.

Authors:  J B Milford; C I Davidson
Journal:  JAPCA       Date:  1987-02

8.  Air pollution and daily mortality: a review and meta analysis.

Authors:  J Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities.

Authors:  D W Dockery; C A Pope; X Xu; J D Spengler; J H Ware; M E Fay; B G Ferris; F E Speizer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The metropolitan acid aerosol characterization study: results from the summer 1994 Washington, D.C. field study.

Authors:  H H Suh; Y Nishioka; G A Allen; P Koutrakis; R M Burton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  41 in total

1.  Ultrafine particles and nitrogen oxides generated by gas and electric cooking.

Authors:  M Dennekamp; S Howarth; C A Dick; J W Cherrie; K Donaldson; A Seaton
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Particulate matter concentrations in residences: an intervention study evaluating stand-alone filters and air conditioners.

Authors:  S Batterman; L Du; G Mentz; B Mukherjee; E Parker; C Godwin; J-Y Chin; A O'Toole; T Robins; Z Rowe; T Lewis
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 5.770

3.  PM2.5 of ambient origin: estimates and exposure errors relevant to PM epidemiology.

Authors:  Qing Yu Meng; Barbara J Turpin; Andrea Polidori; Jong Hoon Lee; Clifford Weisel; Maria Morandi; Steven Colome; Thomas Stock; Arthur Winer; Jenfeng Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Sources of indoor air pollution in New York City residences of asthmatic children.

Authors:  Rima Habre; Brent Coull; Erin Moshier; James Godbold; Avi Grunin; Amit Nath; William Castro; Neil Schachter; Annette Rohr; Meyer Kattan; John Spengler; Petros Koutrakis
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Proximity of licensed child care facilities to near-roadway vehicle pollution.

Authors:  Douglas Houston; Paul Ong; Jun Wu; Arthur Winer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Indoor and outdoor measurements of particle number concentration in near-highway homes.

Authors:  Christina H Fuller; Doug Brugge; Paige L Williams; Murray A Mittleman; Kevin Lane; John L Durant; John D Spengler
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  Improved exposure characterization with robotic (PIPER) sampling and association with children's respiratory symptoms, asthma and eczema.

Authors:  Maya Ramagopal; Zuocheng Wang; Kathleen Black; Marta Hernandez; Adam A Stambler; Osiloke H Emoekpere; Gediminas Mainelis; Stuart L Shalat
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  Predicting residential indoor concentrations of nitrogen dioxide, fine particulate matter, and elemental carbon using questionnaire and geographic information system based data.

Authors:  Lisa K Baxter; Jane E Clougherty; Chritopher J Paciorek; Rosalind J Wright; Jonathan I Levy
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Do questions reflecting indoor air pollutant exposure from a questionnaire predict direct measure of exposure in owner-occupied houses?

Authors:  C K Jennifer Loo; Richard G Foty; Amanda J Wheeler; J David Miller; Greg Evans; David M Stieb; Sharon D Dell
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Predictors of indoor air concentrations in smoking and non-smoking residences.

Authors:  Marie-Eve Héroux; Nina Clark; Keith Van Ryswyk; Ranjeeta Mallick; Nicolas L Gilbert; Ian Harrison; Kathleen Rispler; Daniel Wang; Angelos Anastassopoulos; Mireille Guay; Morgan MacNeill; Amanda J Wheeler
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.