Literature DB >> 10619697

Three lay mental models of disease inheritance.

B J Henderson1, B T Maguire.   

Abstract

Genetics are coming to play an increasing role in biomedical understanding of common diseases. The implication of such findings is that at-risk individuals may be offered predictive genetic tests. How do individuals make decisions about predictive tests and what information do they need to make informed choices? Richards [Richards, M.P.M., 1993. The new genetics: some issues for social scientists. Sociology of Health and Illness 15, 567-586] has argued the first step in understanding and helping people to make these decisions is to investigate lay beliefs of genetics. This study examined mental models of inheritance in a sample of 72 lay people. Through analysis of open-ended questionnaires we found three mental models which loosely corresponded to three phases of historical development in the science of genetics. These we labelled the Constitutional, Mendelian and Molecular Models. Predictions for individuals holding each model are made for the comprehension of genetic information in a testing situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10619697     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00286-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  11 in total

1.  Communication about DTC testing: commentary on a 'family experience of personal genomics'.

Authors:  Anna Middleton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: a theoretical review.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Essay contest reveals misconceptions of high school students in genetics content.

Authors:  Kenna R Mills Shaw; Katie Van Horne; Hubert Zhang; Joann Boughman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Gene-environment interactions and health inequalities: views of underserved communities.

Authors:  Aaron J Goldenberg; Christopher D Hartmann; Laura Morello; Sanjur Brooks; Kari Colón-Zimmermann; Patricia A Marshall
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-03-15

5.  Asking the right questions: views on genetic variation research among black and white research participants.

Authors:  Jada Bussey-Jones; Gail Henderson; Joanne Garrett; Mairead Moloney; Connie Blumenthal; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Decisions to seek healthcare based on family health history among urban Appalachian women.

Authors:  Robyn A Cree; John Lynch; Margaret G Au; Melanie F Myers
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Perceptions of familial risk in those seeking a genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Susan Hiraki; Clara A Chen; J Scott Roberts; L Adrienne Cupples; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  What is in a cause? Exploring the relationship between genetic cause and felt stigma.

Authors:  Pamela Sankar; Mildred K Cho; Paul Root Wolpe; Cynthia Schairer
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Getting a head start: the importance of personal genetics education in high schools.

Authors:  Johnny T Kung; Marnie E Gelbart
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2012-03-29

10.  Where culture meets genetics: Exploring Latina immigrants' lay beliefs of disease inheritance.

Authors:  Katie Fiallos; Jill Owczarzak; Joann Bodurtha; Sonia Beatriz Margarit; Lori Erby
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.