Literature DB >> 10619242

Comparative measurements on a series of accelerators by the same vendor.

R J Watts1.   

Abstract

A series of comparative measurements were conducted during a 12-month period on a series of linear accelerators made by the same vendor. These measurements were conducted during acceptance and commissioning of six Varian model 2100C linear accelerators which had identical beam energies and beam modifiers. Nominal accelerating potentials, scatter measurements, depth doses, beam profiles, wedge and electron beam descriptors are presented. The results show highly similar beam parameters with observed variations being approximately equivalent to the precision of measurement. This similarity implies that a standard data set can be used to validate new commissioning data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10619242     DOI: 10.1118/1.598796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

1.  A mathematical approach to beam matching.

Authors:  B Sarkar; A Manikandan; M Nandy; M S Gossman; C S Sureka; A Ray; N Sujatha
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Evaluation of beam matching accuracy among six linacs from the same vendor.

Authors:  Chockkalingam Krishnappan; Chandrasekaran Anu Radha; Karunakaran Balaji; Prasanna Kumar Mani; Vendhan Subramani; Velmurugan Thanigaimalai; Madhan Kumar Gunasekaran; Velayudham Ramasubramanian
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-09-29

3.  Technical Report: Reference photon dosimetry data for Varian accelerators based on IROC-Houston site visit data.

Authors:  James R Kerns; David S Followill; Jessica Lowenstein; Andrea Molineu; Paola Alvarez; Paige A Taylor; Francesco C Stingo; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Modification and validation of an analytical source model for external beam radiotherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations.

Authors:  Scott E Davidson; Jing Cui; Stephen Kry; Joseph O Deasy; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Milos Vicic; R Allen White; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Agreement Between Institutional Measurements and Treatment Planning System Calculations for Basic Dosimetric Parameters as Measured by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core-Houston.

Authors:  James R Kerns; David S Followill; Jessica Lowenstein; Andrea Molineu; Paola Alvarez; Paige A Taylor; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Dosimetric analysis of beam-matching procedure of two similar linear accelerators.

Authors:  Janhavi R Bhangle; V K Sathiya Narayanan; Namitha K Kumar; R Vaitheeswaran
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2011-07

7.  Comparison of patient-specific intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance for the prostate across multiple institutions.

Authors:  Kazuki Kubo; Hajime Monzen; Kohei Shimomura; Kenji Matsumoto; Tomoharu Sato; Mikoto Tamura; Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; Kentaro Ishii; Ryu Kawamorita
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-10-17

8.  Reference photon dosimetry data: a preliminary study of in-air off-axis factor, percentage depth dose, and output factor of the Siemens Primus linear accelerator.

Authors:  S H Cho; G S Ibbott
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Clinical implementation of electron energy changes of varian linear accelerators.

Authors:  Sean Zhang; Praimakorn Liengsawangwong; Patricia Lindsay; Karl Prado; Tzouh-Liang Sun; Roy Steadham; Xiaochun Wang; Mohammad Salehpour; Michael Gillin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Commissioning measurements for photon beam data on three TrueBeam linear accelerators, and comparison with Trilogy and Clinac 2100 linear accelerators.

Authors:  Gloria P Beyer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.