Literature DB >> 10619160

Spatial and stochastic simulation to evaluate the impact of events and control measures on the 1997-1998 classical swine fever epidemic in The Netherlands. I. Description of simulation model.

A W Jalvingh1, M Nielen, H Maurice, A J Stegeman, A R Elbers, A A Dijkhuizen.   

Abstract

The simulation model InterCSF was developed to simulate the Dutch Classical Swine Fever (CSF) epidemic of 1997-98 as closely as possible. InterCSF is a spatial, temporal and stochastic simulation model. The outcomes of the various replications give an estimate of the variation in size and duration of possible CSF-epidemics. InterCSF simulates disease spread from an infected farm to other farms through three contact types (animals, vehicles, persons) and through local spread up to a specified distance. The main disease-control mechanisms that influence the disease spread in InterCSF are diagnosis of the infected farms, depopulation of infected farms, movement-control areas, tracing, and pre-emptive slaughter. InterCSF was developed using InterSpread as the basis. InterSpread was developed for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). This paper describes the process of modifying InterSpread into InterCSF. This involved changing the assumptions and mechanisms for disease spread from FMD to CSF. In addition, CSF-specific control measures based on the standard European Union (EU) regulations were included, as well as additional control measures that were applied during the Dutch epidemic. To adapt InterCSF as closely as possible to the Dutch 1997/98 epidemic, data from the real epidemic were analysed. Both disease spread and disease-control parameters were thus specifically based on the real epidemic. In general, InterSpread turned out to be a flexible tool that could be adapted to simulate another disease with relative ease. The most difficult were the modifications necessary to mimic the real epidemic as closely as possible. The model was well able to simulate an epidemic with a similar pattern over time for number of detected farms as the real outbreak; but the absolute numbers were (despite many relevant modifications) not exactly the same--but were within an acceptable range. Furthermore, the development of InterCSF provided the researchers with a better insight into the existing knowledge gaps. In part II (see the final paper in this issue), InterCSF was used to compare various control strategies as applied to this epidemic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10619160     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(99)00080-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  11 in total

Review 1.  Models of foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  Matt J Keeling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Simulated detection of syndromic classical swine fever on a Finnish pig-breeding farm.

Authors:  S M Raulo; T Lyytikäinen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Contribution of company affiliation and social contacts to risk estimates of between-farm transmission of avian influenza.

Authors:  Jessica H Leibler; Marco Carone; Ellen K Silbergeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Interaction effects between sender and receiver processes in indirect transmission of Campylobacter jejuni between broilers.

Authors:  Bram A D van Bunnik; Thomas J Hagenaars; Nico M Bolder; Gonnie Nodelijk; Mart C M de Jong
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Influence on disease spread dynamics of herd characteristics in a structured livestock industry.

Authors:  Tom Lindström; Susanna Sternberg Lewerin; Uno Wennergren
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Modeling Classical Swine Fever Outbreak-Related Outcomes.

Authors:  Shankar Yadav; Nicole J Olynk Widmar; Hsin-Yi Weng
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-02-03

7.  Evaluation of Movement Restriction Zone Sizes in Controlling Classical Swine Fever Outbreaks.

Authors:  Shankar Yadav; Nicole Olynk Widmar; Donald C Lay; Candace Croney; Hsin-Yi Weng
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-01-10

8.  Estimating the scale of adverse animal welfare consequences of movement restriction and mitigation strategies in a classical swine fever outbreak.

Authors:  Shankar Yadav; Hsin-Yi Weng
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Local spread of classical swine fever upon virus introduction into The Netherlands: mapping of areas at high risk.

Authors:  Gert Jan Boender; Gonnie Nodelijk; Thomas J Hagenaars; Armin R W Elbers; Mart C M de Jong
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  The influence of between-farm distance and farm size on the spread of classical swine fever during the 1997-1998 epidemic in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Gert Jan Boender; Rob van den Hengel; Herman J W van Roermund; Thomas J Hagenaars
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.