Literature DB >> 10619154

The classical swine fever epidemic 1997-1998 in The Netherlands: descriptive epidemiology.

A R Elber1, A Stegeman, H Moser, H M Ekker, J A Smak, F H Pluimers.   

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to describe the severe epidemic of classical swine fever (CSF) in The Netherlands in 1997-1998 under a policy of non-vaccination, intensive surveillance, pre-emptive slaughter and stamping out in an area which has one of the highest pig and herd densities in Europe. The primary outbreak was detected on 4 February 1997 on a mixed sow and finishing pig herd. A total of 429 outbreaks was observed during the epidemic, and approximately 700,000 pigs from these herds were slaughtered. Among these outbreaks were two artificial insemination centres, which resulted in a CSF-suspect declaration of 1680 pig herds (mainly located in the southern part of The Netherlands). The time between introduction of CSF virus (CSFV) into the country and diagnosis of CSF in the primary outbreak was estimated to be approximately 6 weeks. It is presumed that CSFV was spread from The Netherlands to Italy and Spain via shipment of infected piglets in the beginning of February 1997, before the establishment of a total stand-still of transportation. In June 1997, CSFV is presumed to be introduced into Belgium from The Netherlands. Pre-emptive slaughter of herds that had been in contact with infected herds or were located in close vicinity of infected herds, was carried out around the first two outbreaks. However, this policy was not further exercised till mid-April 1997, when pre-emptive slaughter became a standard operational procedure for the rest of the epidemic. In total, 1286 pig herds were pre-emptively slaughtered. (approximately 1.1 million pigs). A total of 44 outbreaks (10%) was detected via pre-emptive slaughter. When there were clinical signs, the observed symptoms in infected herds were mainly atypical: fever, apathy, ataxia or a combination of these signs. In 322 out of 429 outbreaks (75%), detection was bases on clinical signs observed: 32% was detected by the farmer, 25% by the veterinary practitioner, 10% of the outbreaks by tracing teams and 8% by screening teams of the veterinary authorities. In 76% of the outbreaks detected by clinical signs, the farmer reported to have seen clinical symptoms for less than 1 week before diagnosis, in 22% for 1-4 weeks before diagnosis, and in 4 herds (1%) the farmer reported to have seen clinical symptoms for more than 4 weeks before diagnosis. Transportation lorries played a major role in the transmission of CSFV before the primary outbreak was diagnosed. It is estimated that approximately 39 herds were already infected before the first measures of the eradication campaign came into force. After the first measures to stop the spread of CSFV had been implemented, the distribution of the most likely routes of transmission markedly changed. In most outbreaks, a neighbourhood infection was indicated. Basically, there were two reasons for this catastrophe. Firstly, there was the extent of the period between introduction of the virus in the region and detection of the first outbreak. As a result, CSFV had opportunities to spread from one herd to another during this period. Secondly, the measures initially taken did not prove sufficient in the swine- and herd-dense region involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10619154     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(99)00074-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  38 in total

1.  Neighbourhood control policies and the spread of infectious diseases.

Authors:  L Matthews; D T Haydon; D J Shaw; M E Chase-Topping; M J Keeling; M E J Woolhouse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Phylogenetic analysis of the E2 gene of classical swine fever virus from the Guangxi Province of southern China.

Authors:  Ting Rong Luo; Su-Huan Liao; Xian-Shi Wu; Li Feng; Zhao-Xia Yuan; Hui Li; Jing-Jing Liang; Xian-Ming Meng; Hong-Yun Zhang
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.332

3.  Modelling the effectiveness and risks of vaccination strategies to control classical swine fever epidemics.

Authors:  Jantien A Backer; Thomas J Hagenaars; Herman J W van Roermund; Mart C M de Jong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Simulated detection of syndromic classical swine fever on a Finnish pig-breeding farm.

Authors:  S M Raulo; T Lyytikäinen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.451

5.  Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; José Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Liisa Helena Sihvonen; Hans Spoolder; Karl Ståhl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Simon Gubbins; Jan Arend Stegeman; Sotiria-Eleni Antoniou; Inma Aznar; Alessandro Broglia; Eliana Lima; Yves Van der Stede; Gabriele Zancanaro; Helen Clare Roberts
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-07-21

6.  Balancing detection and eradication for control of epidemics: sudden oak death in mixed-species stands.

Authors:  Martial L Ndeffo Mbah; Christopher A Gilligan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Robert M Christley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Modelling the wind-borne spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus between farms.

Authors:  Amos Ssematimba; Thomas J Hagenaars; Mart C M de Jong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Potential for epidemic take-off from the primary outbreak farm via livestock movements.

Authors:  Michael J Tildesley; Victoriya V Volkova; Mark Ej Woolhouse
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Assessing the mandatory bovine abortion notification system in France using unilist capture-recapture approach.

Authors:  Anne Bronner; Viviane Hénaux; Timothée Vergne; Jean-Luc Vinard; Eric Morignat; Pascal Hendrikx; Didier Calavas; Emilie Gay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.