Literature DB >> 10617775

North Carolina macular dystrophy (MCDR1) locus: a fine resolution genetic map and haplotype analysis.

K W Small1, N Udar, S Yelchits, R Klein, C Garcia, G Gallardo, B Puech, V Puech, D Saperstein, J Lim, J Haller, C Flaxel, R Kelsell, D Hunt, K Evans, F Lennon, M Pericak-Vance.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We previously reported linkage of North Carolina macular dystrophy in a single isolated family to a broad region on chromosome 6q16. In order to refine the localization of the MCDR1 gene (North Carolina macular dystrophy), additional families with this disease and new markers were studied.
METHODS: We ascertained 10 families with the North Carolina macular dystrophy phenotype (MCDR1). These families were of various ethnic and geographic origins such as Caucasian, Mayan Indian, African-American, French, British, German, and American of European decent. Two hundred thirty-two individuals in these families underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations and blood was collected for genotyping. One hundred seventeen were found to be affected. Linkage simulation studies were performed. Two-point linkage, haplotype analysis, and multipoint linkage was performed using VITESSE and FASTLINK. HOMOG was used to test for genetic heterogeneity.
RESULTS: The clinical features were consistent with the diagnosis of North Carolina macular dystrophy in all families. Multipoint linkage analysis indicates that the MCDR1 gene is in the interval between D6D249 and D6S1671 with a maximum LOD score of 41.52. There was no evidence of genetic heterogeneity among the families studied. Families 765, 768, 772, 1193, and 1292 shared the same chromosomal haplotype in this region.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest single data set of families with the MCDR1 phenotype. The single large family from North Carolina continues to be informative for the closest flanking markers and alone supports the minimal candidate region as suggested by previous studies. There remains no evidence of genetic heterogeneity in this disease. Most of the American families appear to have descended from the same ancestral mutation. The remaining families could each represent independent origins of the mutation in the MCDR1 gene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10617775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Vis        ISSN: 1090-0535            Impact factor:   2.367


  8 in total

1.  A whole-genome screen of a quantitative trait of age-related maculopathy in sibships from the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  James H Schick; Sudha K Iyengar; Barbara E Klein; Ronald Klein; Karlie Reading; Rachel Liptak; Christopher Millard; Kristine E Lee; Sandra C Tomany; Emily L Moore; Bonnie A Fijal; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  The genetics of inherited macular dystrophies.

Authors:  M Michaelides; D M Hunt; A T Moore
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Clinical characterization and genetic mapping of North Carolina macular dystrophy.

Authors:  Zhenglin Yang; Zongzhong Tong; Louis J Chorich; Erik Pearson; Xian Yang; Anthony Moore; David M Hunt; Kang Zhang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  North Carolina Macular Dystrophy Is Caused by Dysregulation of the Retinal Transcription Factor PRDM13.

Authors:  Kent W Small; Adam P DeLuca; S Scott Whitmore; Thomas Rosenberg; Rosemary Silva-Garcia; Nitin Udar; Bernard Puech; Charles A Garcia; Thomas A Rice; Gerald A Fishman; Elise Héon; James C Folk; Luan M Streb; Christine M Haas; Luke A Wiley; Todd E Scheetz; John H Fingert; Robert F Mullins; Budd A Tucker; Edwin M Stone
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Clinical and genetic characterization of a Danish family with North Carolina macular dystrophy.

Authors:  Thomas Rosenberg; Ben Roos; Thorkild Johnsen; Niels Bech; Todd E Scheetz; Michael Larsen; Edwin M Stone; John H Fingert
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.367

6.  Case report: North Carolina macular dystrophy misdiagnosed as congenital ocular toxoplasmosis.

Authors:  Moktika Tandon; Christopher Barnett; Deepa Taranath
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.367

7.  Multimodal imaging in hereditary retinal diseases.

Authors:  Francesco Pichi; Mariachiara Morara; Chiara Veronese; Paolo Nucci; Antonio P Ciardella
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  A novel duplication involving PRDM13 in a Turkish family supports its role in North Carolina macular dystrophy (NCMD/MCDR1).

Authors:  Kent W Small; Stijn Van de Sompele; Karen Nuytemans; Andrea Vincent; Ozge Ozalp Yuregir; Emine Ciloglu; Cahfer Sariyildiz; Toon Rosseel; Jessica Avetisjan; Nitin Udar; Jeffery M Vance; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Elfride De Baere; Fadi S Shaya
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.367

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.