Literature DB >> 10616145

Calculation of a pencil beam kernel from measured photon beam data.

P R Storchi1, L J van Battum, E Woudstra.   

Abstract

Usually, pencil beam kernels for photon beam calculations are obtained by Monte Carlo calculations. In this paper, we present a method to derive a pencil beam kernel from measured beam data, i.e. central axis depth doses, phantom scatter factors and off-axis ratios. These data are usually available in a radiotherapy planning system. The differences from other similar works are: (a) the central part of the pencil beam is derived from the measured penumbra of large fields and (b) the dependence of the primary photon fluence on the depth caused by beam hardening in the phantom is taken into account. The calculated pencil beam will evidently be influenced by the methods and instruments used for measurement of the basic data set. This is of particular importance for an accurate prediction of the absorbed dose delivered by small fields. Comparisons with measurements show that the accuracy of the calculated dose distributions fits well in a 2% error interval in the open part of the field, and in a 2 mm isodose shift in the penumbra region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10616145     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/12/305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  13 in total

1.  High-precision radiotherapy for craniospinal irradiation: evaluation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical TomoTherapy.

Authors:  D S Sharma; T Gupta; R Jalali; Z Master; R D Phurailatpam; R Sarin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Monte Carlo simulations applied to conjunctival lymphoma radiotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Lorenzo Brualla; Ricardo Palanco-Zamora; Klaus-Peter Steuhl; Norbert Bornfeld; Wolfgang Sauerwein
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Dose calculation accuracies in whole breast radiotherapy treatment planning: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Shogo Hatanaka; Yuki Miyabe; Naoki Tohyama; Yu Kumazaki; Masahiko Kurooka; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Hidenobu Tachibana; Satoshi Kito; Akihisa Wakita; Yuko Ohotomo; Hiroyuki Ikagawa; Satoshi Ishikura; Miwako Nozaki; Yoshikazu Kagami; Masahiro Hiraoka; Teiji Nishio
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-02-03

4.  Introducing matrix sparsity with kernel truncation into dose calculations for fluence optimization.

Authors:  Hunter Stephens; Q Jackie Wu; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2021-11-12

5.  The impact of dose calculation algorithms on partial and whole breast radiation treatment plans.

Authors:  Parminder S Basran; Sergei Zavgorodni; Tanya Berrang; Ivo A Olivotto; Wayne Beckham
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Dose prediction accuracy of anisotropic analytical algorithm and pencil beam convolution algorithm beyond high density heterogeneity interface.

Authors:  Suresh B Rana
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2013-01

7.  A comparison of anatomical and dosimetric variations in the first 15 fractions, and between fractions 16 and 25, of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Haihua Yang; Yu Tu; Wei Wang; Wei Hu; Weijun Ding; Changhui Yu; Chao Zhou
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Influence of increased target dose inhomogeneity on margins for breathing motion compensation in conformal stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Anne Richter; Kurt Baier; Juergen Meyer; Juergen Wilbert; Thomas Krieger; Michael Flentje; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  BMC Med Phys       Date:  2008-12-03

9.  Development of a modelling to correlate site and diameter of brain metastases with hippocampal sparing using volumetric modulated Arc therapy.

Authors:  Silvia Chiesa; Mario Balducci; Luigi Azario; Simona Gaudino; Francesco Cellini; Gian Carlo Mattiucci; Cesare Colosimo; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Comparison between measured and calculated dynamic wedge dose distributions using the anisotropic analytic algorithm and pencil-beam convolution.

Authors:  Paola Francisca Caprile; Carlos Daniel Venencia; Pelayo Besa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.