Literature DB >> 10615697

The effect of temporal placement on gap detectability.

K B Snell1, H L Hu.   

Abstract

The detectability of a masked sinusoid increases as its onset approaches the temporal center of a masker. This study was designed to determine whether a similar change in detectability would occur for a silent gap as it was parametrically displaced from the onset of a noise burst. Gap thresholds were obtained for 13 subjects who completed five replications of each condition in 3 to 13 days. Six subjects were inexperienced listeners who ranged in age from 18 to 25 years; seven subjects were highly experienced and ranged in age from 20 to 78 years. The gaps were placed in 150-ms, 6-kHz, low-passed noise bursts presented at an overall level of 75 dB SPL; the bursts were digitally shaped at onset and offset with 10-ms cosine-squared rise-fall envelopes. The gated noise bursts were presented in a continuous, unfiltered, white noise floor attenuated to an overall level of 45 dB SPL. Gap onsets were parametrically delayed from the onset of the noise burst (defined as the first nonzero point on the waveform envelope) by 10, 11, 13, 15, 20, 40, 60, 110, 120, and 130 ms. Results of ANOVAs indicated that the mean gap thresholds were longer when the gaps were proximal to signal onset or offset and shorter when the gaps approached the temporal center of the noise burst. Also, the thresholds of the younger, highly experienced subjects were significantly shorter than those of the younger, inexperienced subjects, especially at placements close to signal onset or offset. The effect of replication (short-term practice) was not significant nor was the interaction between gap placement and replication. Post hoc comparisons indicated that the effect of gap placement resulted from significant decreases in gap detectability when the gap was placed close to stimulus onset and offset.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615697     DOI: 10.1121/1.428210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Gap duration discrimination for frequency-asymmetric gap markers: psychophysical and electrophysiological findings.

Authors:  John H Grose; Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of temporal cues in word identification by younger and older adults: effects of sentence context.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace Yeni-Komshian; Peter Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of Gap Position on Perceptual Gap Detection Across Late Childhood and Adolescence.

Authors:  Jennifer D Gay; Merri J Rosen; Julia Jones Huyck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-02

4.  Biological markers of auditory gap detection in young, middle-aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Bernhard Ross; Bruce Schneider; Joel S Snyder; Claude Alain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.

Authors:  Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Patrick M Zurek
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12-11

6.  Measures of hearing threshold and temporal processing across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Diane Kewley-Port; Daniel Fogerty; Dana Kinney
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The effects of age on sensory thresholds and temporal gap detection in hearing, vision, and touch.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Thomas A Busey; James C Craig; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers.

Authors:  Ning-ji He; John H Mills; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Unanesthetized auditory cortex exhibits multiple codes for gaps in cochlear implant pulse trains.

Authors:  Alana E Kirby; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-04

10.  Auditory gap-in-noise detection behavior in ferrets and humans.

Authors:  Joshua R Gold; Fernando R Nodal; Fabian Peters; Andrew J King; Victoria M Bajo
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.