Literature DB >> 10615691

Psychometric functions for gap detection in a yes-no procedure.

M Florentine1, S Buus, W Geng.   

Abstract

To examine models of temporal resolution and to investigate the decision processes underlying the detection of a brief pause in a bandpass noise, psychometric functions for gap detection were measured at octave frequencies from 0.25 to 8 kHz. Three normal listeners were tested using a constant-stimulus procedure with a cued Yes-No paradigm. The Minimum Detectable Gap (MDG) estimated from the midpoint of the psychometric functions decreased systematically with increasing frequency. The slopes of the psychometric functions generally increased as the test frequency increased up to 2 kHz, but remained constant at the higher frequencies. Two models were investigated: an energy-detector model and a loudness-detector model. Both consisted of auditory filtering, a nonlinearity, and short-term integration. In the energy-detector model, the nonlinearity was a square law. In the loudness-detector model, it was a compressive power law. Using the usual Gaussian approximations, the energy-detector model fails at low frequencies because the probability distributions of short-term energy differ from Gaussian distributions. The probability distributions of short-term loudness closely follow Gaussian distributions. The loudness-detector model predicts the frequency dependence of the MDG quite accurately, except at 0.25 kHz. It also predicts psychometric functions that resemble the data at low frequencies, but the predicted slopes increase much less with frequency than the measured slopes. This result may indicate that the onset response to the trailing marker of the gap provides an important cue for detection of gaps with durations exceeding the MDG.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615691     DOI: 10.1121/1.428204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Rhythmicity and cross-modal temporal cues facilitate detection.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Charles E Schroeder; David Poeppel; Nienke van Atteveldt; Elana Zion-Golumbic
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Training with an auditory perceptual learning game transfers to speech in competition.

Authors:  E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera; Mark A Philipp; Trevor Stavropoulos; Audrey Anna Carrillo; Sierra Cheung; Tess K Koerner; Michelle R Molis; Frederick J Gallun; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2021-09-21

3.  Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers.

Authors:  Ning-ji He; John H Mills; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory temporal resolution in adaptive tasks. Gap detection investigation.

Authors:  Abdulsalam A Alhaidary; Kishore Tanniru; Adel F Aljadaan; Lamya M Alabdulkarim
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  PsyAcoustX: A flexible MATLAB(®) package for psychoacoustics research.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-12

6.  Study of the right ear advantage on gap detection tests.

Authors:  Alessandra Giannella Samelli; Eliane Schochat
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.