Literature DB >> 10615490

Revisiting motion repulsion: evidence for a general phenomenon?

H J Rauber1, S Treue.   

Abstract

Previous studies have found large misperceptions when subjects are reporting the perceived angle between two directions of motion moving transparently at an acute angle, the so called motion repulsion. While these errors have been assumed to be caused by interactions between the two directions present, we reassessed these earlier measurements taking into account recent findings about directional misperceptions affecting the perception of single motion (reference repulsion). While our measurements confirm that errors in directional judgments of transparent motions can indeed be as big as 22 degrees we find that motion repulsion, i.e. the interaction between two directions, contributes at most about 7 degrees to these errors. This value is comparable to similar repulsion effects in orientation perception and stereoscopic depth perception, suggesting that they share a common neural basis. Our data further suggest that fast time scale adaptation and/or more general interactions between neurons contribute to motion repulsion while tracking eye movements play little or no role. These findings should serve as important constraints for models of motion perception.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615490     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00025-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  18 in total

1.  Perceived motion direction during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Jan L Souman; Ignace Th C Hooge; Alexander H Wertheim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Diverted by dazzle: perceived movement direction is biased by target pattern orientation.

Authors:  Anna E Hughes; Christian Jones; Kaustuv Joshi; David J Tolhurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Do perceptual biases emerge early or late in visual processing? Decision-biases in motion perception.

Authors:  Elisa Zamboni; Timothy Ledgeway; Paul V McGraw; Denis Schluppeck
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Interactions between visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Precision of working memory for visual motion sequences and transparent motion surfaces.

Authors:  Nahid Zokaei; Nikos Gorgoraptis; Bahador Bahrami; Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual working memory contaminates perception.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Sang Wook Hong; Randolph Blake; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

7.  Distance estimation is influenced by encoding conditions.

Authors:  Anna Oleksiak; Mirosława Mańko; Albert Postma; Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert V van den Berg; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predicting human perceptual decisions by decoding neuronal information profiles.

Authors:  Tzvetomir Tzvetanov; Thilo Womelsdorf
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Turning Symbolic: The Representation of Motion Direction in Working Memory.

Authors:  Tal Seidel Malkinson; Yoni Pertzov; Ehud Zohary
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-16

10.  Motion noise changes directional interaction between transparently moving stimuli from repulsion to attraction.

Authors:  Jennifer L Gaudio; Xin Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.