Literature DB >> 10615469

Perceiving the sweet spot.

C Carello1, S Thuot, K L Anderson, M T Turvey.   

Abstract

Many sports involve aligning a hitting implement with a ball trajectory such that contact is made at the implement's center of percussion or 'sweet spot'. This spot is not visibly distinct; its perception must be haptic. Although it is functionally defined with respect to contact--it is the point of impact that produces the least vibration in the hand holding the implement--hitting success requires appreciating the location of the sweet spot prior to contact. Two experiments verified that perceivers (novices as well as expert tennis players) distinguished perception of length from perception of the position of the sweet spot simply on the basis of wielding, both for tennis rackets and for bats contrived from wooden rods with attached masses. Results conformed to previous research on dynamic touch in showing that perceiving the lengths of wielded objects, including selectively perceiving partial lengths, is constrained by inertial properties of the object.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615469     DOI: 10.1068/p2716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  6 in total

1.  The sweet spot of a biological hammer: the centre of percussion of glyptodont (Mammalia: Xenarthra) tail clubs.

Authors:  R Ernesto Blanco; Washington W Jones; Andrés Rinderknecht
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Felt heaviness is used to perceive the affordance for throwing but rotational inertia does not affect either.

Authors:  Qin Zhu; Kevin Shockley; Michael A Riley; Michael T Tolston; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Getting off on the right (or left) foot: perceiving by means of a rod attached to the preferred or non-preferred foot.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Wagman; Alen Hajnal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Switching tools: perceptual-motor recalibration to weight changes.

Authors:  Sandee Scott; Rob Gray
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sensitivity to hierarchical relations among affordances in the assembly of asymmetric tools.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Wagman; Sarah E Caputo; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Fractal fluctuations in exploratory movements predict differences in dynamic touch capabilities between children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and typical development.

Authors:  Bruna S Avelar; Marisa C Mancini; Sergio T Fonseca; Damian G Kelty-Stephen; Débora M de Miranda; Marco Aurélio Romano-Silva; Priscila A de Araújo; Paula L Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.