Literature DB >> 10613936

An economic analysis of an aggressive diagnostic strategy with single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging and early exercise stress testing in emergency department patients who present with chest pain but nondiagnostic electrocardiograms: results from a randomized trial.

S A Stowers1, E L Eisenstein, F J Th Wackers, D S Berman, J L Blackshear, A D Jones, T J Szymanski, L C Lam, T A Simons, D Natale, K A Paige, G S Wagner.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Conventional emergency department testing strategies for patients with chest pain often do not provide unequivocal diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. This study was conducted to determine whether the routine use of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging at rest and early exercise stress testing to assess intermediate-risk patients with chest pain and no ECG evidence of acute ischemia will lead to earlier discharges, more discriminate use of coronary angiography, and an overall reduction in average costs of care with no adverse clinical outcomes.
METHODS: All patients in this study had technetium 99m tetrofosmin SPECT imaging at rest and were randomly assigned to either a conventional (results of the imaging test blinded to the physician) or perfusion imaging-guided (results of the imaging test unblinded to the physician) strategy. Patients in the conventional arm were treated at their physician's discretion. Patients in the perfusion imaging-guided arm were treated according to a predefined protocol based on SPECT imaging test results: coronary angiography after a positive scan result and exercise treadmill testing after a negative scan result. Study endpoints consisted of total in-hospital costs and length of stay. Hospital costs were calculated using hospital department-specific Medicare cost/charge ratios. Length of stay was calculated as total hospital room days billed (regular and intensive care).
RESULTS: We enrolled 46 patients, 9 with acute myocardial infarctions. Patients randomly assigned to the perfusion imaging-guided arm had $1,843 (95% confidence interval [CI] $431 to $6,171) lower median in-hospital costs and 2.0-day (95% CI 1.0 to 3.0 days) shorter median lengths of stay but similar rates of in-hospital and 30-day follow up events as patients in the conventional arm.
CONCLUSION: An ED chest pain diagnostic strategy incorporating acute resting (99m)Tc tetrofosmin SPECT imaging and early exercise stress testing may lead to reduced in-hospital costs and decreased length of stay for patients with acute chest pain and nondiagnostic ECGs.
Copyright © 2000 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10613936     DOI: 10.1016/S0196-0644(00)70100-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  24 in total

1.  Can acute rest imaging shorten evaluation in chest pain centers?

Authors:  F J Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  American Society of Nuclear Cardiology position statement on radionuclide imaging in patients with suspected acute ischemic syndromes in the emergency department or chest pain center.

Authors:  Frans J Th Wackers; Kenneth A Brown; Gary V Heller; Michael C Kontos; James L Tatum; James E Udelson; Jack A Ziffer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Emergency department assessment of patients with acute chest pain: myocardial perfusion imaging, blood tests, or both?

Authors:  Kevin C Allman; S Ben Freedman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Supine-prone SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: the poor man's attenuation compensation.

Authors:  Stephen A Stowers; Richard Umfrid
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Radionuclide imaging in risk assessment after acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  J E Udelson; E J Flint
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Acute rest myocardial perfusion imaging for chest pain.

Authors:  Michael C Kontos; Frans J Th Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Magnetocardiogram recordings in a nonshielded environment--reproducibility and ischemia detection.

Authors:  Benjamin A Steinberg; Ariel Roguin; Stanley P Watkins; Peter Hill; Dharsh Fernando; Jon R Resar
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 8.  Cost-effectiveness of myocardial perfusion imaging: a summary of the currently available literature.

Authors:  Roger D Des Prez; Leslee J Shaw; Robert L Gillespie; Wael A Jaber; Gavin L Noble; Prem Soman; David G Wolinsky; Kim A Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Noninvasive cardiac imaging in suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; S Richard Underwood; Roxy Senior; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Outcomes research in cardiovascular imaging: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Allen Taylor; Diane Bild; Robert Bonow; Philip Greenland; Michael Lauer; Frank Peacock; James Udelson
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.