Literature DB >> 10611881

Total hip arthroplasty in patients with proximal femoral deformity.

D J Berry1.   

Abstract

Most proximal femoral deformities encountered during hip arthroplasty are secondary to developmental processes, previous osteotomy, or fracture. A classification method is proposed in which deformities are categorized anatomically by level. Anatomic deformity levels include: greater trochanteric deformities, femoral neck deformities, metaphyseal level deformities, and diaphyseal level deformities. Deformities at each level may be angular, rotational or translational, abnormal bone size, or a combination thereof. Treatment is individualized according to patient needs and the anatomy of the deformity. Careful preoperative planning helps predict prosthesis requirements and technical challenges. If cemented implants are used, care must be taken to obtain reasonable alignment and a continuous cement mantle. For uncemented implants, obtaining a good fit is challenging and there is a risk of intraoperative fracture. Access to a wide range of implants helps the surgeon treat unique femoral geometries. Implants fixed in the diaphysis allow some proximal femoral deformities to be bypassed. Modular or custom implants simplify treatment of certain deformities. For patients with severe deformities, femoral osteotomy may be required. Successful osteotomy requires correcting the deformity, maintaining vascular supply of fragments, obtaining fixation of osteotomy fragments (with the implant or adjunctive fixation), and obtaining implant stability. Although most deformities can be treated during hip arthroplasty, occasionally there is a role for two-stage treatment: deformity correction followed later by arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10611881     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199912000-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

Review 1.  Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Umberto Cottino; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Hip arthroplasty in the presence of proximal femoral deformity].

Authors:  A Rakow; P Simon; C Perka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Periprosthetic femur fractures treated with modular fluted, tapered stems.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; David G Lewallen; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The pelvic support osteotomy: indications and preoperative planning.

Authors:  Dimitrios Pafilas; Selvadurai Nayagam
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2008-08-30

5.  Greater trochanter morphology and association with patient demographics, surgical factors, and post-operative stem position: a retrospective assessment of 150 cementless THRs in 135 dogs.

Authors:  Catrina J Silveira; Katherine H Barnes; Sharon C Kerwin; W Brian Saunders
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Custom stems for femoral deformity in patients less than 40 years of age: 70 hips followed for an average of 14 years.

Authors:  Michael Akbar; Guenther Aldinger; Knut Krahmer; Thomas Bruckner; Peter R Aldinger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Modular stem in total hip arthroplasty for patients with trochanter valgus deformity: surgical technique and case series.

Authors:  Xiangpeng Kong; Wei Chai; Minzhi Yang; Alvin Ong; Jiying Chen; Yan Wang; Yonggang Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.