Literature DB >> 10611868

One-stage revision surgery of the infected hip. A minimum 10-year followup study.

J J Callaghan1, R P Katz, R C Johnston.   

Abstract

Between 1977 and 1983, 24 one-stage revision surgeries were performed for septic failure of a total hip arthroplasty in 24 patients by one surgeon. Twelve patients died and none were lost to followup at a minimum of 10 years after the procedure. Infection reoccurred around two hips (8.3%). If the selected criteria (patients without draining sinuses, without immunocompromise, and with adequate bone quality after debridement) and the standard approach (meticulous debridement, use of antibiotic-impregnated cement, and use of 3 to 6 months postoperative oral antibiotic therapy) used in this study are implemented, direct exchange of an infected total hip arthroplasty construct is a reasonable and cost-effective alternative for some patients with infection after total hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10611868     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199912000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  40 in total

1.  Assessing the gold standard: a review of 253 two-stage revisions for infected TKA.

Authors:  Tahir Mahmud; Matthew C Lyons; Douglas D Naudie; Steven J Macdonald; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Two-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty: our experience with interval prosthesis.

Authors:  N Prasad; V Paringe; R Kotwal; A Ghandour; R Morgan Jones
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-05

3.  Comparison of static and mobile antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sang-Jin Park; Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon; Taek-Rim Yoon; Gi-Heon Park
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  What is the Long-term Economic Societal Effect of Periprosthetic Infections After THA? A Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Parisi; Joseph F Konopka; Hany S Bedair
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  The Role of One-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Fiachra E Rowan; Matthew J Donaldson; Jurek R Pietrzak; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

6.  Pre-operative scoring system to determine the surgical strategy for periprosthetic hip infection.

Authors:  Kenichi Oe; Hirokazu Iida; Narumi Ueda; Tomohisa Nakamura; Naofumi Okamoto; Yusuke Ueda
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  [Early results of one-stage septic revision arthroplasties with antibiotic-laden cement. A clinical and statistical analysis].

Authors:  D Sofer; B Regenbrecht; J Pfeil
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  One-stage cementless revision arthroplasty for infected hip replacements.

Authors:  Jeong Joon Yoo; Young Sam Kwon; Kyung-Hoi Koo; Kang Sup Yoon; Young-Min Kim; Hee Joong Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Outcome of one-stage cementless exchange for acute postoperative periprosthetic hip infection.

Authors:  Erik Hansen; Matthew Tetreault; Benjamin Zmistowski; Craig J Della Valle; Javad Parvizi; Fares S Haddad; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Two-stage procedure in the treatment of late chronic hip infections--spacer implantation.

Authors:  Mohamed Sukeik; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.