Literature DB >> 10611197

Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization.

E G Wood1, F R Batzer, K J Go, J N Gutmann, S L Corson.   

Abstract

Attempts to improve clinical pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer are constantly being made. Two changes in technique of embryo transfer of potential clinical importance were evaluated over two contiguous time periods in order to observe any corresponding change in clinical pregnancy (CP) rate per transfer: (i) embryo transfer catheter; (ii) ultrasound guidance. Catheter choices were hard: Tefcat, Tom Cat, or Norfolk; or soft: Frydman or Wallace. Ultrasound visualization was considered to be excellent/good when the catheter could be followed from the cervix to the fundus by transabdominal ultrasound with retention of the embryo-containing fluid droplet; fair/poor if visualization could not document the sequence of events. Embryo transfers were performed in 518 cycles. CP rates per transfer using soft and hard catheters was 36 and 17% (P < 0.000) respectively. CP rates per transfer for transfers performed with and without ultrasound guidance were 38 and 25% (P < 0.002) respectively. A statistically significant difference was also noted when visualization ranks were compared. CP rates per transfer in all excellent/good ultrasound-guided transfers was 41.5 versus 16.7% for fair/poor transfers (P < 0.038). In conclusion, performance of embryo transfer with a soft catheter under ultrasound guidance with good visualization resulted in a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10611197     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.1.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  19 in total

1.  Impact of technical difficulties, choice of catheter, and the presence of blood on the success of embryo transfer--experience from a single provider.

Authors:  Hassan N Sallam; Abdel Fattah Agameya; Ashraf Farrag Rahman; Fathy Ezzeldin; Ahmed N Sallam
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Ultrasound guidance is not necessary during easy embryo transfers.

Authors:  Anice Maria Vieira de Camargo Martins; Ricardo L R Baruffi; Ana L Mauri; Claudia Petersen; João Batista Alcantara Oliveira; Paula Contart; Anagloria Pontes; José G Franco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Abdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves clinical pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization: experiences from 330 clinical investigations.

Authors:  Rong Li; Lihua Lu; Guiqin Hao; Kai Zhong; Zhiming Cai; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The pre-cycle blind mock embryo transfer is an inaccurate predictor of anticipated embryo transfer depth.

Authors:  Kristin L Miller; John L Frattarelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Impact of transabdominal ultrasound guidance on performance and outcome of transcervical uterine embryo transfer.

Authors:  Sebastian Mirkin; Estella L Jones; Jacob F Mayer; Laurel Stadtmauer; William E Gibbons; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Does catheter choice during embryo transfer alter the pregnancy rate?

Authors:  Pankaj Talwar; Nikita Naredi; K Sandeep; G S Joneja; B S Duggal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-10-22

7.  Validity of trans-rectal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer against retroflexed uterus.

Authors:  Tetsuya Isobe; Hiroyuki Minoura; Hiroaki Kawato; Nagayasu Toyoda
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2004-01-29

8.  Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Tiffany L Rhodes; Thomas P McCoy; H Lee Higdon; William R Boone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Does catheter type effect pregnancy rate in intrauterine insemination cycles?

Authors:  Karen L Smith; Daniel R Grow; Halina P Wiczyk; Donna L O'Shea; Margaret Arny
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Elevated body mass index (BMI) does not adversely affect in vitro fertilization outcome in young women.

Authors:  Kurt Martinuzzi; Sarah Ryan; Martha Luna; Alan B Copperman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.