Literature DB >> 10610801

Allele-specific suppression as a tool to study protein-protein interactions in bacteria.

M D Manson1.   

Abstract

Suppression analysis is well suited to study the interactions of gene products. It offers the advantage of simplicity for any organism for which a convenient genetic system has been developed, which holds for a wide spectrum of bacteria and an ever-increasing number of unicellular as well as complex eukaryotes. No other method provides as much information about the functional relationships of biological macromolecules. The intrinsic value of suppression analysis is enhanced by advances in genomics and in biophysical techniques for investigating the properties of nucleic acids and proteins, such as X-ray crystallography, liquid and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance, electron spin labeling, and isothermal calorimetry. These approaches confirm and complement whatever is revealed by genetics. Despite these sterling qualities, suppression analysis has its dangers, less in execution than in conceptualization of experiments and interpretation of data. A consistent nomenclature is essential for a uniform and widespread understanding of the results. Familiarity with the genetic background and idiosyncracies of the organism studied is critical in avoiding extraneous phenomena that can affect the outcome. Finally, it is imperative not to underestimate potentially bizarre and improbable consequences that can transpire when rigorous genetic selection is maintained for an appreciable length of time. The article begins with a somewhat pedagogical discussion of genetic terminology. It then moves on to the necessary precautions to observe while planning and conducting suppression analysis. The remainder of the article considers different manifestations of suppression: bypass suppression; gradients of suppression; suppression by relaxed specificity; allele-specific "suppression at a distance"; and true conformational suppression. The treatment is not exhaustive, but representative examples have been gleaned from the recent bacterial literature. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10610801     DOI: 10.1006/meth.1999.0902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  10 in total

1.  Conformational suppression of inter-receptor signaling defects.

Authors:  Peter Ames; John S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Suppressor Analysis of the Fusogenic Lambda Spanins.

Authors:  Jesse Cahill; Manoj Rajaure; Ashley Holt; Russell Moreland; Chandler O'Leary; Aneesha Kulkarni; Jordan Sloan; Ry Young
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Herpes simplex virus 1 pUL34 plays a critical role in cell-to-cell spread of virus in addition to its role in virus replication.

Authors:  Alison C Haugo; Moriah L Szpara; Lance Parsons; Lynn W Enquist; Richard J Roller
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 4.  Mechanisms of suppression: The wiring of genetic resilience.

Authors:  Jolanda van Leeuwen; Carles Pons; Charles Boone; Brenda J Andrews
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Bahjat F Marayati; James B Pease; Ke Zhang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 6.  Suppressor Mutants: History and Today's Applications.

Authors:  David E Bautista; Joseph F Carr; Angela M Mitchell
Journal:  EcoSal Plus       Date:  2021-12-15

7.  Allele-Specific Interactions between CAST AWAY and NEVERSHED Control Abscission in Arabidopsis Flowers.

Authors:  William D Groner; Megan E Christy; Catherine M Kreiner; Sarah J Liljegren
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Loss of Elongation-Like Factor 1 Spontaneously Induces Diverse, RNase H-Related Suppressor Mutations in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Bahjat F Marayati; Alena L Drayton; James F Tucker; Reid H Huckabee; Alicia M Anderson; James B Pease; Clifford W Zeyl; Ke Zhang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Rapid adaptation of signaling networks in the fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae.

Authors:  Stefan Bohnert; Luis Antelo; Christiane Grünewald; Alexander Yemelin; Karsten Andresen; Stefan Jacob
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Involvement of FtsE ATPase and FtsX extracellular loops 1 and 2 in FtsEX-PcsB complex function in cell division of Streptococcus pneumoniae D39.

Authors:  Lok-To Sham; Katelyn R Jensen; Kevin E Bruce; Malcolm E Winkler
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 7.867

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.