Literature DB >> 10609740

Long-term evaluation of patients with progressive condylar resorption following orthognathic surgery.

T J Hoppenreijs1, P J Stoelinga, K L Grace, C M Robben.   

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term treatment results of 26 patients who developed progressive condylar resorption (PCR) following a bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomy (n= 19) or a bimaxillary osteotomy (n=7). PCR was diagnosed clinically and from a comparison of pre- and postoperative cephalometric and orthopantomographic radiographs. The preoperative condylar configuration and resorption pattern were assessed distinguishing between 'deep bite' and 'open bite'. Patients with 'deep bites' tended to have more resorption on the superior site of the condyle, while 'anterior open bites' often had resorption on the superior and anterior sites of the condyle. The patients were divided into 2 groups, one receiving non-surgical treatment that included splints, orthodontics with or without extractions and restorative dentistry. The second group underwent repeated surgery to treat skeletal relapse. Thirteen patients who underwent non-surgical treatment after orthognathic surgery had satisfactory results from orthodontic dental compensation, although only 3/13 had Class I occlusion. Another 13 patients had unacceptable occlusal and/or esthetic results and, therefore, underwent a second surgery. Following surgery, 7 patients had satisfactory occlusal and esthetic results and were skeletally stable. Four patients had 40-80% relapse, but with a stable occlusion. Two patients had 120% and 100% relapse, respectively, and needed a third surgical intervention. The first patient had a stable occlusal and esthetic result with approximately 30% relapse at pogonion, but the second patient still had an unstable malocclusion with again 100% relapse. It appeared that, without surgical intervention after PCR, further resorption ceased after approximately two years. Second surgery appeared to produce variable results, but, in this series, the majority had significant improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10609740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  21 in total

Review 1.  Mandibular condyle displacements after orthognathic surgery-an overview of quantitative studies.

Authors:  Dominik Pachnicz; António Ramos
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

2.  Long-term stability and condylar remodeling after mandibular advancement: A 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lauren Ehardt; Antonio Ruellas; Sean Edwards; Erika Benavides; Matthew Ames; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  [Evaluation of mandibular stability and condylar volume after orthognathic surgery in patients with severe temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis].

Authors:  L Hou; G H Ye; X J Liu; Z L Li
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

4.  Skeletal relapse following sagittal split ramus osteotomy advancement.

Authors:  Nanda Kishore Sahoo; Balakrishnan Jayan; Ankur Thakral; Vishvaroop Nagpal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-09-13

5.  The Anatomical Basis for Plate Fixation in BSSO to Minimize Condylar Torquing: A Comparative CT Study of Mandibular Advancement and Setback.

Authors:  Thomas Zachariah; Rajkumar Bharathi; Manikandhan Ramanathan; Anantanarayanan Parameswaran
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2021-04-19

6.  Counterclockwise maxillomandibular advancement surgery and disc repositioning: can condylar remodeling in the long-term follow-up be predicted?

Authors:  L R Gomes; L H Cevidanes; M R Gomes; A C Ruellas; D P Ryan; B Paniagua; L M Wolford; J R Gonçalves
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Positional change of the condyle after orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment: is there a relationship to skeletal relapse?

Authors:  Husanov Zafar; Dong-Soon Choi; Insan Jang; Bong-Kuen Cha; Young-Wook Park
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-26

Review 8.  Orthognathic surgery and temporomandibular joint symptoms.

Authors:  Hwi-Dong Jung; Sang Yoon Kim; Hyung-Sik Park; Young-Soo Jung
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-05-28

Review 9.  Relapse and temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD) as postoperative complication in skeletal class III patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas Gosla Reddy; Ashutosh Dixit; Padmanidhi Agarwal; Rebecca Chowdhry; Ashi Chug
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-06-30

Review 10.  TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Lucia Helena Cevidanes; Wesley Cabral Rocha; Guilherme de Araújo Almeida; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.