Literature DB >> 34408370

The Anatomical Basis for Plate Fixation in BSSO to Minimize Condylar Torquing: A Comparative CT Study of Mandibular Advancement and Setback.

Thomas Zachariah1, Rajkumar Bharathi1, Manikandhan Ramanathan1, Anantanarayanan Parameswaran1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Condylar displacement after bilateral sagittal-split osteotomy (BSSO) occur in the sagittal plane as clockwise/counter-clockwise rotation of the ramus, in the coronal plane as medial/lateral inclination, or in the axial plane as medial/lateral condylar torquing. The purpose of this prospective CT study was to evaluate the role of plate fixation in minimizing condylar torquing or rotational changes in the axial plane.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was carried out on 26 patients, 13 of whom underwent advancement BSSO and 13 setback BSSO, without maxillary LeFort I osteotomies. All mandibular movements were symmetrical. Fixation of the osteotomized segments was achieved with a single 4-hole plate and monocortical screws. In case of mandibular setbacks, a straight plate was used, whereas an inset-bent plate was used for advancements. Computed tomography scans were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively to measure condylar rotation or torqueing in the axial plane. An increase in condylar angle on axial slices was considered as lateral condylar torquing, whereas a decrease was considered as medial condylar torquing.
RESULTS: A mean medial condylar torquing of 0.2° was noted postoperatively in case of setbacks (p > 0.05 not significant). This suggested minimal condylar torquing, indicating that the proximal and distal segments maintained contact at the anterior vertical osteotomy fixed with a straight plate. In case of advancements, a mean lateral condylar torquing of 2.2° was noted postoperatively (p < 0.005, highly significant). This suggested that the proximal segment flare at the anterior vertical osteotomy site was maintained by inset-bent plate fixation.
CONCLUSION: The gaps between the proximal and distal segments created by mandibular advancement and setback should be maintained. An attempt to close these gaps, especially in mandibular advancement, will result in an unfavourable axial condylar torque. Consequently, the areas of bony contact between the proximal and distal osteotomy sites created by mandibular advancement and setback should be maintained as well. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BSSO fixation; Condylar rotation; Condylar torque; Mandibular sagittal-split osteotomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34408370      PMCID: PMC8313615          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-021-01564-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  27 in total

1.  The role of a posteriorly inclined condylar neck in condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  S J Hwang; P E Haers; H F Sailer
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  A method to passively align the sagittal ramus osteotomy segments.

Authors:  Edward Ellis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Condylar head remodeling following mandibular setback osteotomy for prognathism: a comparative study of different imaging modalities.

Authors:  Akitoshi Katsumata; Minori Nojiri; Masami Fujishita; Yoshiko Ariji; Eiichiro Ariji; Robert P Langlais
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-11-11

4.  Plate fixation after mandibular osteotomy.

Authors:  K Ueki; K Nakagawa; S Takatsuka; E Yamamoto
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Control of the condylar-proximal mandibular segments after sagittal split osteotomies to advance the mandible.

Authors:  B N Epker; G A Wylie
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1986-12

6.  Condylar displacement and temporomandibular joint dysfunction following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and rigid fixation.

Authors:  F L Hackney; J E Van Sickels; P V Nummikoski
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Horizontal changes of the proximal mandibular segment after mandibular setback surgery using 3-dimensional computed tomography data.

Authors:  Bo-Ram Yeo; Jeong Joon Han; Seunggon Jung; Hong-Ju Park; Hee-Kyun Oh; Min-Suk Kook
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2017-07-25

8.  Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Young-Chea Roh; Sang-Hun Shin; Seong-Sik Kim; George K Sandor; Yong-Deok Kim
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Three-dimensional analysis of condylar remodeling and skeletal relapse following bimaxillary surgery: A 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Tong Xi; Rik van Luijn; Frank Baan; Ruud Schreurs; Martien de Koning; Stefaan Bergé; Thomas Maal
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Modification of the mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomy.

Authors:  L M Wolford; M A Bennett; C G Rafferty
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1987-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.