Literature DB >> 10609711

Instrumented measurement of anteroposterior and inversion-eversion laxity of the normal ankle joint complex.

J E Kovaleski1, L R Gurchiek, R J Heitman, J M Hollis, A W Pearsall.   

Abstract

Manual examination is the most common method for the evaluation of ankle anteroposterior (AP) and inversion-eversion (I-E) laxity. Objective assessment data of normal ankle laxity must be provided before comparison with an injured ankle can be made. The purpose of this study was to compare AP translation and I-E rotation at three force loads between dominant and nondominant ankles and to assess the test-retest reliability of a portable arthrometer in obtaining these measurements. The arthrometer consists of a frame that is fixed to the foot, a pad that is attached to the tibia, and a load-measuring handle that is attached to the foot plate through which the load is applied. A six-degrees-of-freedom spatial kinematic linkage system is connected between the tibial pad and the foot frame to measure motion. Instrumented measurement testing of total AP displacement and I-E rotation of both ankles was performed in 41 subjects (21 men and 20 women; mean age, 23.8 +/- 4.4 years). Subjects had no history of ankle injury. Subjects were tested in the supine position while lying on a table with the knee secured in extension and the foot positioned at 0 degrees of flexion. Laxity was measured from total AP displacement (millimeters) during loading to 125 N of AP force and from total I-E rotation (degrees of range of motion) during loading to 4000 N-mm. Reliability was evaluated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) at 75 N, 100 N, and 125 N of AP force and at 2000, 3000, and 4000 N-mm torque loads. Mean differences for displacement and rotation between the dominant and nondominant ankles at each of the force and torque loads were analyzed by dependent t-tests. For both the dominant and nondominant ankles, respectively, the reliability coefficients at each of the force loads for AP displacement (range, 0.82-0.89) and I-E rotation (range, 0.86-0.97) were high. The t-test analyses showed no significant differences (P > or = 0.05) for total AP displacement or I-E rotation between the dominant and nondominant ankles at any of the force loads. The results are clinically useful in providing information about the reliability of measures at different AP and I-E force loads using a portable ankle ligament arthrometer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10609711     DOI: 10.1177/107110079902001210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of ankle arthrometry to stress ultrasound imaging in the assessment of ankle laxity in healthy adults.

Authors:  Leah Sisson; Theodore Croy; Susan Saliba; Jay Hertel
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-12

2.  Assessment of Ankle-Subtalar-Joint-Complex Laxity Using an Instrumented Ankle Arthrometer: An Experimental Cadaveric Investigation.

Authors:  John E Kovaleski; J Hollis; Robert J Heitman; Larry R Gurchiek; Albert W Pearsall
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Analysis of ankle-hindfoot stability in patients with ankle instability and normals.

Authors:  Kota Watanabe; Tadashi Fujii; Harold B Kitaoka; Brian R Kotajarvi; Zong-Ping Luo; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Joint stability characteristics of the ankle complex in female athletes with histories of lateral ankle sprain, part II: clinical experience using arthrometric measurement.

Authors:  John E Kovaleski; Robert J Heitman; Larry R Gurchiek; J M Hollis; Wei Liu; Albert W Pearsall
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Joint stability characteristics of the ankle complex after lateral ligamentous injury, part I: a laboratory comparison using arthrometric measurement.

Authors:  John E Kovaleski; Robert J Heitman; Larry R Gurchiek; J M Hollis; Wei Liu; Albert W Pearsall
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  Chronic ankle instability in sporting populations.

Authors:  Alison Suzanne Attenborough; Claire E Hiller; Richard M Smith; Max Stuelcken; Andrew Greene; Peter J Sinclair
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Important issues concerning use of term 'copers' in chronic ankle instability research.

Authors:  Wen Liu; Tarang Kumar Jain; Marcio Santos; David Heller; Claire Hiller
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Physical Activity Levels in College Students With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Tricia Hubbard-Turner; Michael J Turner
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Functional Anatomy, Pathomechanics, and Pathophysiology of Lateral Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Application of generalizability theory in estimating the reliability of ankle-complex laxity measurement.

Authors:  Robert J Heitman; John E Kovaleski; Steven F Pugh
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.