Literature DB >> 10606907

Acquiring surgical skills.

J M Hamdorf1, J C Hall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Technical competence is the bedrock of surgery, yet it has only recently been viewed as a valid area for either critical evaluation or formal teaching.
METHODS: This review examines the teaching of surgical skills. The core is derived from a literature search of the Medline computer database. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: The impetus for surgical change has generally related to the introduction of new technology. Advances initially allowed for open operation within the main body cavities; more recently minimal access surgery has appeared. The latter was introduced in an inappropriate manner, which has led to the evolution of teaching of technical skills away from an apprenticeship-based activity towards more formal skill-based training programmes. There is now a need for a solid theoretical base for the teaching of manual skills that accommodates concepts of surgical competence.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10606907     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01327.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  38 in total

1.  Training in tasks with different visual-spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance.

Authors:  P Ström; A Kjellin; L Hedman; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester (ADEPT) objectifying subjective psychomotor test performance.

Authors:  M P Schijven; J Jakimowicz; C Schot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Should we continue oesophageal surgery in a district general hospital? A review of 200 consecutive cases.

Authors:  T C B Dehn; Iain Paterson; David Hunter; David Rae
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Disparity between resident and attending physician perceptions of intraoperative supervision and education.

Authors:  Kimberly L Levinson; Joyce N Barlin; Kristiina Altman; Andrew J Satin
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-03

5.  Simulation based training.

Authors:  K Moorthy; C Vincent; A Darzi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-05

6.  Hand dominance and performance in a laparoscopic skills curriculum.

Authors:  T W Powers; D J Bentrem; A P Nagle; M T Toyama; S A Murphy; K M Murayama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Toward reliable operative assessment: the reliability and feasibility of videotaped assessment of laparoscopic technical skills.

Authors:  D Dath; G Regehr; D Birch; C Schlachta; E Poulin; J Mamazza; R Reznick; H M MacRae
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Experimental trial of transvaginal cholecystectomy: an ex vivo analysis of the learning process for a novel single-port technique.

Authors:  F C Becerra Garcia; M C Misra; H K Bhattacharjee; G Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Intraoperative consultation as an instrument of quality management.

Authors:  Wolfgang Teichmann; Wilm Rost; Daniel Thieme; Sven Petersen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Mastery versus the standard proficiency target for basic laparoscopic skill training: effect on skill transfer and retention.

Authors:  Nicoleta O Kolozsvari; Pepa Kaneva; Chantalle Brace; Genevieve Chartrand; Marilou Vaillancourt; Jiguo Cao; Daniel Banaszek; Sebastian Demyttenaere; Melina C Vassiliou; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.