Literature DB >> 10606217

Measurement of maximal power output in isokinetic and non-isokinetic cycling. A comparison of two methods.

R Baron1, N Bachl, R Petschnig, H Tschan, G Smekal, R Pokan.   

Abstract

The main goal of the study was to compare maximal power output and power output at different pedalling frequencies obtained during isokinetic all-out tests with maximal power output obtained during a single all-out sprint (against the same braking force for every subject). Sixty healthy male subjects participated in the study. The ergometer system used in this study has three operating modes: the isokinetic mode (maintaining pedal crank velocity constant at a present level), a revolution dependent mode and a revolution independent mode. In all three operating modes the effective forces are monitored by means of strain gauge. All subjects performed a single all-out sprint against a braking force of 20 Newton and an all-out isokinetic cycling test consisting of ten 10 s bouts of maximal cycling at speeds ranging from 50 rpm to 140 rpm. In both tests, irrespective of which test mode was used, the mean power for a complete crank revolution showed parabolic relationships to crank velocity. For the isokinetic test, the subjects showed a peak power (IsoWpeak) of 15.3+/-1.7 W/kg corresponding to an optimal velocity of 115+/-8.6 rpm. For the force-velocity test NonisoWpeak (the highest power obtained at any time during the test) was 14.4+/-1.9 W/kg and was achieved at a pedalling rate of 127+/-14 rpm. IsoWpeak was significantly higher than NonisoWpeak (p<0.001) but there were no significant differences between NonisoWpeak and IsoWmax (maximal mean power for each full crank revolution) for the revolutions from 90 rpm to 140 rpm. Though, NonisoWpeak and IsoWpeak are significantly different, there was a strong relationship between NonisoWpeak and IsoWpeak (r = 0.7158, p<0.001). There was also a strong relationship between NonisoWpeak and IsoWmax for the revolutions from 50 rpm to 120 rpm (p<0.001) and at 130 rpm (p<0.01).

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10606217     DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-8839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  6 in total

1.  Fatigue and optimal conditions for short-term work capacity.

Authors:  Brian R MacIntosh; Krista Svedahl; Minhan Kim
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Power output of the lower limb during variable inertial loading: a comparison between methods using single and repeated contractions.

Authors:  S J Pearson; M Cobbold; S D R Harridge
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  The science of cycling: factors affecting performance - part 2.

Authors:  Erik W Faria; Daryl L Parker; Irvin E Faria
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  The measurement of maximal (anaerobic) power output on a cycle ergometer: a critical review.

Authors:  Tarak Driss; Henry Vandewalle
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Fatigue-Free Force-Velocity and Power-Velocity Profiles for Elite Track Sprint Cyclists: The Influence of Duration, Gear Ratio and Pedalling Rates.

Authors:  Anna Katharina Dunst; Clemens Hesse; Olaf Ueberschär; Hans-Christer Holmberg
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31

6.  Reliability of Force-Velocity Tests in Cycling and Cranking Exercises in Men and Women.

Authors:  Hamdi Jaafar; Elvis Attiogbé; Majdi Rouis; Henry Vandewalle; Tarak Driss
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.