Literature DB >> 10606011

Discrimination, reversal, and shift learning in Huntington's disease: mechanisms of impaired response selection.

A D Lawrence1, B J Sahakian, R D Rogers, J R Hodge, T W Robbins.   

Abstract

In a series of three experiments, we investigated different aspects of response selection in early-stage clinically symptomatic Huntington's disease (HD) patients in the context of discrimination learning. A series of structurally related response selection tasks involving discrimination, reversal, and shift learning were employed. In Experiment 1, the mechanisms of our previously reported [37] finding of impaired extra-dimensional shift learning were explored. The results suggested that impaired shift learning in HD is a result of perseverative responding. In Experiment 2, performance on a concurrent-pair (CP) discrimination and reversal task was examined. HD patients showed no deficits in CP discrimination learning or reversal. In Experiment 3, the performance of HD patients on a probabilistic discrimination and reversal task was examined. HD patients were impaired in the learning of a probabilistic discrimination, and also its reversal. This reversal deficit was again the result of perseverative responding. In addition, there was a strong correlation between HD patients' activities of daily living scores and reversal errors. The result are consistent with current theories of the role of the basal ganglia in cognition, and suggest specific impairments in response selection mechanisms in HD, in particular, in overcoming selection biases based on prior reinforcement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10606011     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00035-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  34 in total

1.  Modulation of attention in discrimination learning: the roles of stimulus relevance and stimulus-outcome correlation.

Authors:  Metin Uengoer; Harald Lachnit
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Reduced activity at the 5-HT(2C) receptor enhances reversal learning by decreasing the influence of previously non-rewarded associations.

Authors:  S R O Nilsson; T L Ripley; E M Somerville; P G Clifton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Contributions of striatal dopamine signaling to the modulation of cognitive flexibility.

Authors:  Martin Darvas; Richard D Palmiter
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Association of attentional shift and reversal learning to functional deficits in geriatric depression.

Authors:  Guy G Potter; Douglas R McQuoid; Martha E Payne; Warren D Taylor; David C Steffens
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.485

5.  Human reversal learning under conditions of certain versus uncertain outcomes.

Authors:  Anna-Maria D'Cruz; Michael E Ragozzino; Matthew W Mosconi; Mani N Pavuluri; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Dissociable roles for the nucleus accumbens core and shell in regulating set shifting.

Authors:  Stan B Floresco; Sarvin Ghods-Sharifi; Claudia Vexelman; Orsolya Magyar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  CNTRICS final task selection: long-term memory.

Authors:  John D Ragland; Roshan Cools; Michael Frank; Diego A Pizzagalli; Alison Preston; Charan Ranganath; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 9.306

8.  The BACHD Rat Model of Huntington Disease Shows Signs of Fronto-Striatal Dysfunction in Two Operant Conditioning Tests of Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  Erik Karl Håkan Clemensson; Laura Emily Clemensson; Olaf Riess; Huu Phuc Nguyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The neural basis of reversal learning: An updated perspective.

Authors:  A Izquierdo; J L Brigman; A K Radke; P H Rudebeck; A Holmes
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Performance of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice on a touchscreen-based attentional set-shifting task.

Authors:  Price E Dickson; Michele A Calton; Guy Mittleman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.