Literature DB >> 10604553

A double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of treatment with fluticasone propionate and levocabastine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. FLNCO2 Italian Study Group.

C Ortolani1, A Foresi, G Di Lorenzo, G Bagnato, F Bonifazi, N Crimi, L Emmi, M Prandini, G E Senna, A Tursi, C Mirone, C Leone, P Fina, R Testi.   

Abstract

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) is a topically active glucocorticoid which has been successfully used for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). Topical levocabastine is a highly selective H1 antagonist which has been proposed as an alternative treatment of SAR. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of two topical nasal treatments, FPANS and levocabastine, in the treatment of SAR. Additionally, the effect of treatments on nasal inflammation was examined during natural pollen exposure. A group of 288 adolescent and adult patients with at least a 2-year history of SAR to seasonal pollens participated in a multicenter, doubleblind, double-dummy, and placebo-controlled study. Patients were treated with either FPANS 200 microg, once daily (n = 97), or topical levocabastine, 200 microg, given twice daily (n = 96), or matched placebo (n = 95) for a period of 6 weeks, starting from the expected beginning of the pollen season. Clinically relevant pollens included Parietaria, olive, and grass. Assessment of efficacy was based on scores of daily nasal symptoms and on nasal cytology of nasal lavage. Nasal lavage was performed immediately before, during, and at the end of treatment in 39 patients. FPANS significantly increased the percentage of symptom-free days for nasal obstruction on waking and during the day, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching. FPANS provided a better control for night and day nasal obstruction (P<0.02 and P<0.01) and rhinorrhea (P<0.01) than levocabas tine. In addition, fewer patients treated with FPANS used rescue medication (P<0.025). The percentage of eosinophils in nasal lavage was reduced only during treatment with FPANS. The results of this study indicate that FPANS 200 microg, once daily, provides a better clinical effect than levocabastine 200 microg, twice daily, in patients with SAR. Unlike levocabastine, FPANS significantly attenuates nasal eosinophilia during pollen exposure, a feature which may explain its therapeutic efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10604553     DOI: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.1999.00200.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  8 in total

Review 1.  Intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis: superior relief?

Authors:  L P Nielsen; N Mygind; R Dahl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Safety and tolerability profiles of intranasal antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Rami Jean Salib; Peter Hugo Howarth
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Clinical course of rhinitis and changes in vivo and in vitro of allergic parameters in elderly patients: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Gabriele Di Lorenzo; Maria Stefania Leto-Barone; Simona La Piana; Vito Ditta; Gaetana Di Fede; Giovam Battista Rini
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 4.  Hay fever in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Aziz Sheikh; Sukhmeet Singh Panesar; Sarah Salvilla; Sangeeta Dhami
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-11-18

Review 5.  Intranasal steroids in the treatment of allergy-induced rhinorrhea.

Authors:  Robert A Nathan
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 8.667

6.  Treatment of congestion in upper respiratory diseases.

Authors:  Eli O Meltzer; Fernan Caballero; Leonard M Fromer; John H Krouse; Glenis Scadding
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-04-08

7.  Patient preference and sensory perception of three intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Chaweewan Bunnag; Dr Suprihati; De-Yun Wang
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  In vitro effects of fluticasone propionate on IL-13 production by mitogen-stimulated lymphocytes.

Authors:  Gabriele Di Lorenzo; Maria Luisa Pacor; Maria Esposito Pellitteri; Sebastiano Gangemi; Patrizia Di Blasi; Giuseppina Candore; Alfredo Colombo; Domenico Lio; Calogero Caruso
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.711

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.