Literature DB >> 10602850

Magnetic resonance imaging measurements of bone density and cross-sectional geometry.

J Hong1, J A Hipp, R V Mulkern, D Jaramillo, B D Snyder.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used in the assessment of the musculoskeletal system and associated pathology. The ability of MRI to measure the signals from water and lipid protons enables quantitative measurements of bone porosity. The goal of this investigation was to demonstrate that the density and cross-sectional geometry of whole bones can be noninvasively measured using MRI. Ten trabecular specimens cored from whale vertebrae were used to compare apparent bone density measured directly, and using a quantitative MRI algorithm. Bone density and several cross-sectional geometric properties were also measured using MRI in the distal tibia of 14 volunteers. The MRI measurements were compared with measurements made using quantitative-computed tomography (QCT). A proton density sequence was used for all MRI studies. A porosity phantom was included in the MRI examinations and used to convert the MRI signal intensity to bone volume fraction. Bone density and cross-sectional bone geometry were calculated from the bone volume fractions by assuming constant tissue properties. The apparent density of trabecular bone cores measured directly and using quantitative MRI were linearly related (r(2) = 0.959; P < 0. 01). A strong linear relation also existed between MRI and QCT measurements of ash density (r(2) = 0.923; P < 0.01) and cross-sectional geometric properties (r(2) = 0.976-0.992; P < 0.01). MRI data can be used to measure bone density and cross-sectional geometry of whole bones if a proton density sequence is used to homogenize differences in marrow composition and a porosity phantom is used for slice-specific volume fraction calibration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10602850     DOI: 10.1007/s002230050015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  9 in total

1.  Aberration correction for transcranial photoacoustic tomography of primates employing adjunct image data.

Authors:  Chao Huang; Liming Nie; Robert W Schoonover; Zijian Guo; Carsten O Schirra; Mark A Anastasio; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Spatially offset Raman spectroscopy for in vivo bone strength prediction.

Authors:  Chi Shu; Keren Chen; Maria Lynch; Jason R Maher; Hani A Awad; Andrew J Berger
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Soft-tissue spectral subtraction improves transcutaneous Raman estimates of murine bone strength in vivo.

Authors:  Keren Chen; Christine Massie; Andrew J Berger
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.207

4.  Computed tomography-based structural analysis for predicting fracture risk in children with benign skeletal neoplasms: comparison of specificity with that of plain radiographs.

Authors:  Natalie L Leong; Megan E Anderson; Mark C Gebhardt; Brian D Snyder
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Bone matrix imaged in vivo by water- and fat-suppressed proton projection MRI (WASPI) of animal and human subjects.

Authors:  Yaotang Wu; Mirko I Hrovat; Jerome L Ackerman; Timothy G Reese; Haihui Cao; Kirsten Ecklund; Melvin J Glimcher
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  The Lichfield bone study: the skeletal response to exercise in healthy young men.

Authors:  Kyriacos I Eleftheriou; Jaikirty S Rawal; Anthony Kehoe; Laurence E James; John R Payne; James R Skipworth; Zudin A Puthucheary; Fotios Drenos; Dudley J Pennell; Mike Loosemore; Michael World; Steve E Humphries; Fares S Haddad; Hugh E Montgomery
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-11-23

7.  MR imaging pattern of tibial subchondral bone structure: considerations of meniscal coverage and integrity.

Authors:  Aticha Ariyachaipanich; Emel Kaya; Sheronda Statum; Reni Biswas; Betty Tran; Won C Bae; Christine B Chung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  BONE GEOMETRY AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Authors:  Tathyane Krahenbühl; Roseane de Fátima Guimarães; Antonio de Azevedo Barros Filho; Ezequiel Moreira Gonçalves
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2018-01-15

9.  Percentage fat fraction in magnetic resonance imaging: upgrading the osteoporosis-detecting parameter.

Authors:  Rong Chang; Xiaowen Ma; Yonghong Jiang; Dageng Huang; Xiujin Chen; Ming Zhang; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 1.930

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.