Literature DB >> 10601441

Attributes of quiet stance in the chronic spinal cat.

J Fung1, J M Macpherson.   

Abstract

Standing is a dynamic task that requires antigravity support of the body mass and active regulation of the position of the body center of mass. This study examined the extent to which the chronic spinal cat can maintain postural orientation during stance and adapt to changes in stance distance (fore-hindpaw separation). Intact cats adapt to changes in stance distance by maintaining a constant horizontal orientation of the trunk and changing orientation of the limbs, while keeping intralimb geometry constant and aligning the ground reaction forces closely with the limb axes. Postural adaptation was compared in four cats before and after spinalization at the T(6) level, in terms of the forces exerted by each paw against the support, body geometry (kinematics) and electromyographic (EMG) activity recorded from chronic, indwelling electrodes, as well as the computed net torques in the fore and hindlimbs. Five fore-hindpaw distances spanning the preferred distance were tested before spinalization, with a total range of 20 cm from the shortest to the longest stance. After spinalization, the cats were trained on a daily basis to stand on the force platform, and all four cats were able to support their full body weight. Three of the four cats could adapt to changes in stance distance, but the range was smaller and biased toward the shorter distances. The fourth cat could stand only at one stance distance, which was 8 cm shorter than the preferred distance before spinalization. All cats shifted their center of pressure closer to the forelimbs after spinalization, but the amount of shift could largely be accounted for by the weight loss in the hindquarters. The three cats that could adapt to changes in stance distance used a similar strategy as the intact cat by constraining the trunk and changing orientation of the limb axes in close relation with the forces exerted by each limb. However, different postures in the fore- and hindlimbs were adopted, particularly at the scapula (more extended) and pelvis (tipped more anteriorly). Other changes from control included a redistribution of net extensor torque across the joints of the forelimb and of the hindlimb. We concluded that the general form of body axis orientation is relatively conserved in the spinal cat, suggesting that the lumbosacral spinal circuitry includes rudimentary set points for hindlimb geometry. Both mechanical and neural elements can contribute toward maintaining body geometry through stiffness regulation and spinal reflexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10601441     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.6.3056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  17 in total

1.  Postural and locomotor control in normal and vestibularly deficient mice.

Authors:  P-P Vidal; L Degallaix; P Josset; J-P Gasc; K E Cullen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Integrating multiple sensory systems to modulate neural networks controlling posture.

Authors:  I Lavrov; Y Gerasimenko; J Burdick; H Zhong; R R Roy; V R Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Common motor mechanisms support body load in serially homologous legs of cockroaches in posture and walking.

Authors:  Laura A Quimby; Ayman S Amer; Sasha N Zill
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Variability of motoneuron activation and the modulation of force production in a postural reflex of the hermit crab abdomen.

Authors:  Jacob L Krans; William D Chapple
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Cortical control of postural responses.

Authors:  J V Jacobs; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Electromyographic responses from the hindlimb muscles of the decerebrate cat to horizontal support surface perturbations.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; Jinger S Gottschall; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Physiological and circuit mechanisms of postural control.

Authors:  Tatiana G Deliagina; Pavel V Zelenin; Grigori N Orlovsky
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Absence of postural muscle synergies for balance after spinal cord transection.

Authors:  Stacie A Chvatal; Jane M Macpherson; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Postural performance in decerebrated rabbit.

Authors:  P E Musienko; P V Zelenin; V F Lyalka; G N Orlovsky; T G Deliagina
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Quantification of deficits in lateral paw positioning after spinal cord injury in dogs.

Authors:  Lindsay Hamilton; Robin J M Franklin; Nicholas D Jeffery
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.