Literature DB >> 10600419

Accuracy and limitation of functional magnetic resonance imaging for identification of the central sulcus: comparison with magnetoencephalography in patients with brain tumors.

T Inoue1, H Shimizu, N Nakasato, T Kumabe, T Yoshimoto.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to clarify the accuracy and limitation of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for the identification of the central sulcus affected by brain tumors. Twelve normal volunteers and 11 patients with intracranial tumors adjacent to the central sulcus underwent fMRI and magnetoencephalography (MEG). Three patients were evaluated again after surgery. fMRI was performed with a 1.5 Tesla scanner during repetitive opening and closing of each hand. Cross-correlation function was used to identify activation areas, and the central sulcus was defined as the nearest sulcus to the highest activation spots that were determined by elevating correlation coefficient threshold. Somatosensory-evoked fields were measured using a whole head MEG system. The central sulcus was defined as the nearest sulcus to the N20m for the median nerve stimulus. fMRI and MEG coincided in defining the central sulcus in all 24 hemispheres of volunteers and all 10 examined nonaffected hemispheres of patients. The fMRI-defined central sulcus coincided with the MEG-defined central sulcus in nine (82%) but did not in two (18%) affected hemispheres of patients. The preoperative mismatch disappeared after surgery in one of the two patients. The present study indicates that fMRI successfully defined the central sulcus in most of the patients with brain tumors. However, in a few cases, fMRI was not reliable probably due to venous flow changes by tumor compression and/or compensational activity by brain tissues surrounding the primary sensorimotor cortex. For precise functional assessment of the brain affected by intracranial tumors, combination of fMRI and MEG will be recommended. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10600419     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  17 in total

1.  Three-dimensional integration of brain anatomy and function to facilitate intraoperative navigation around the sensorimotor strip.

Authors:  J P Mäkelä; E Kirveskari; M Seppä; M Hämäläinen; N Forss; S Avikainen; O Salonen; S Salenius; T Kovala; T Randell; J Jääskeläinen; R Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  New approach to localize speech relevant brain areas and hemispheric dominance using spatially filtered magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  H Kober; M Möller; C Nimsky; J Vieth; R Fahlbusch; O Ganslandt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Magnetoencephalographic representation of the sensorimotor hand area in cases of intracerebral tumour.

Authors:  M Oishi; M Fukuda; S Kameyama; T Kawaguchi; H Masuda; R Tanaka
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Motor field sensitivity for preoperative localization of motor cortex.

Authors:  Peter T Lin; Mitchel S Berger; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 5.  Mapping cognitive function.

Authors:  Steven M Stufflebeam; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Microtesla MRI of the human brain combined with MEG.

Authors:  Vadim S Zotev; Andrei N Matlashov; Petr L Volegov; Igor M Savukov; Michelle A Espy; John C Mosher; John J Gomez; Robert H Kraus
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Comparison of three methods for localizing interictal epileptiform discharges with magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Hideaki Shiraishi; Seppo P Ahlfors; Steven M Stufflebeam; Susanne Knake; Pål G Larsson; Matti S Hämäläinen; Kyoko Takano; Maki Okajima; Keisaku Hatanaka; Shinji Saitoh; Anders M Dale; Eric Halgren
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 8.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; James W Stinear; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  Functional brain imaging: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-12-01

10.  Intraoperative electrical stimulation mapping as an aid for surgery of intracranial lesions involving motor areas in children.

Authors:  Francesco Signorelli; J Guyotat; C Mottolese; F Schneider; G D'Acunzi; J Isnard
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.