Literature DB >> 10600376

Computer simulations of actin polymerization can explain the barbed-pointed end asymmetry.

D Sept1, A H Elcock, J A McCammon.   

Abstract

Computer simulations of actin polymerization were performed to investigate the role of electrostatic interactions in determining polymerization rates. Atomically detailed models of actin monomers and filaments were used in conjunction with a Brownian dynamics method. The simulations were able to reproduce the measured barbed end association rates over a range of ionic strengths and predicted a slower growing pointed end, in agreement with experiment. Similar simulations neglecting electrostatic interactions indicate that configurational and entropic factors may actually favor polymerization at the pointed end, but electrostatic interactions remove this trend. This result would indicate that polymerization at the pointed end is not only limited by diffusion, but faces electrostatic forces that oppose binding. The binding of the actin depolymerizing factor (ADF) and G-actin complex to the end of a filament was also simulated. In this case, electrostatic steering effects lead to an increase in the simulated association rate. Together, the results indicate that simulations provide a realistic description of both polymerization and the binding of more complex structures to actin filaments. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10600376     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  23 in total

1.  Calculation of weak protein-protein interactions: the pH dependence of the second virial coefficient.

Authors:  A H Elcock; J A McCammon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Thermodynamics and kinetics of actin filament nucleation.

Authors:  D Sept; J A McCammon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome.

Authors:  N A Baker; D Sept; S Joseph; M J Holst; J A McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Differential geometry based solvation model II: Lagrangian formulation.

Authors:  Zhan Chen; Nathan A Baker; G W Wei
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Computational methods for biomolecular electrostatics.

Authors:  Feng Dong; Brett Olsen; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.441

6.  The three mouse actin-depolymerizing factor/cofilins evolved to fulfill cell-type-specific requirements for actin dynamics.

Authors:  Maria K Vartiainen; Tuija Mustonen; Pieta K Mattila; Pauli J Ojala; Irma Thesleff; Juha Partanen; Pekka Lappalainen
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Structural basis for the slow dynamics of the actin filament pointed end.

Authors:  Akihiro Narita; Toshiro Oda; Yuichiro Maéda
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Insights into Actin Polymerization and Nucleation Using a Coarse-Grained Model.

Authors:  Brandon G Horan; Aaron R Hall; Dimitrios Vavylonis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Computational modeling highlights the role of the disordered Formin Homology 1 domain in profilin-actin transfer.

Authors:  Brandon G Horan; Gül H Zerze; Young C Kim; Dimitrios Vavylonis; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.124

10.  Defining the pathogenesis of the human Atp12p W94R mutation using a Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast model.

Authors:  Ann Meulemans; Sara Seneca; Thomas Pribyl; Joel Smet; Valerie Alderweirldt; Anouk Waeytens; Willy Lissens; Rudy Van Coster; Linda De Meirleir; Jean-Paul di Rago; Domenico L Gatti; Sharon H Ackerman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.